Connect with us

Boxing

The creation of Daniel Dubois to the heavyweight master: his dad, Don Charles and Destiny

Published

on

Frank Warren intentionally In December 2023, he threw Daniel Dubois against Jarrell Miller in December 2023.

First of all: the great American is physically challenging.

Secondly: Warren knew that Miller would personally be in a conversation with garbage and go to the mind of Dubois whenever he could.

“I knew that Miller would try to do everything in his power to intimidate him in front of the ring,” said Warren before the fight of Dubois with Oleksander Usyk in London on Saturday.

“I just wanted to force him to exacerbate a mental tightening.”

– Dubois to bring “chaos” against Uyek
– in the Usyk camp: behind the scenes with the heavyweight champion

Veteran the promoter had to know what he would be able to do. He was accused of giving up the defeat of Joe Joyce in 2022 and against Usyk in their first clash in 2023.

Warren wanted to know if he was a warrior or a runner.

Dubois was still looking at the crowd during a stool between rounds. Warren, observing the ring in Saudi Arabia, noticed that he was looking for his dad, Dave (also known as Stanley).

“I went and pulled him [Dave] Out crowd, said Warren. – Don [Charles] He talked to [Daniel] And Don is a good trainer; Don does everything on the spot. But my moment was: it is a voice he listens. “

Sitting side by side, talking to the media before another great opportunity Wembley, Warren and Dubois discuss the key moment.

“From an early age … he is more than a father for you, right? It’s a voice you hear,” says Warren. “So we shout at your dad:” Sobrating stabs, throw your right hand “and that’s how it was. And he has been in the corner since then, right? “

Daniel agrees with a radiant smile.

“If you can’t do it for your dad, who can you do it for?” says.

Dubois won by knockout with 10 seconds in a fight, which was as brutal and exhausting as expected.

This changed his career forever.

Even if they didn’t know it, Dave proved that the turning point and his influence on the 27-year-old could not be overestimated. They both have an extremely close relationship.

His father is also the leitmotif of Daniel in front of the ring just like that night against Miller in 2023 and is still in him.

After defeating Miller in a dramatic way, Dubois faced Filip Hrgovic and Anthony Joshua, winning both fights through the knockout. Unusual series of 3 wins in 10 months; Unprecedented for newfangled heavyweight.


It was Dave who connected Dubois with Charles before the first fight with Usyk in Poland. Despite the losing by knockout, the relationship flourished.

“Seriously, I was in the desert,” says Charles. “I say it privately, I say it in public, I owe his father and [Daniel]. They brought me from the desert. It is all supposed to be.

“It is almost unreal that we are coming back again. Wembley will repeat it again.”

Charles is a believing in the power of the universe and destiny, which, he claims, led him to Dubois and his father.

“It’s about destiny. I wasn’t at the beginning of his professional career, but the path goes as far as he goes, he [Dave] He said he dreamed of it.

“He had a dream and everything he told me that he was fair, he had become before him.”

Warren jokes: “Does he know what he will win 2.30 in Kempton [races] Tomorrow.”


Fight against Usyk is not only fulfilling the destiny of Dubois, but revenge, his team feels during the first fight.

Charles maintains that Usyk is cheating in Poland, reaching the body of Dubois, which was considered low and illegal. Usyk was allowed to recover just below four minutes. He still divides the opinion.

“You tied us. You combined the judge. You combined the boxing world,” Charles announced at the first press conference of the rematch in April.

“God called you to come back here, that our son Daniel Dubois would take revenge on you here.

“You [Usyk] Go as one of the great generations … but you won’t cheat. “

Usyk and his team maintain that it was an illegal shot.

Whatever you think about a blow, it’s in the past. Intigue surrounds the future and Dubois date for purpose.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boxing

Jack Catterall Reveals Career Standstill: Whats Next for the Boxing Star?

Published

on

"Jack Catterall Reveals Career Standstill: What’s Next for the Boxing Star?"

Jack Catterall finds himself waiting on the sidelines while his pursuit of Teofimo Lopez hangs in the air. With Thursday’s negotiation deadline closing in fast, the WBA regular welterweight titleholder admitted publicly that his career is paused.

Addressing questions on social media about potentially taking on Shakur StevensonCatterall made it clear he intends to give the public what they want once his immediate path clears up. Still, he stopped short of promising that Lopez would be standing across from him next.

“My career is currently on hold but in the next week or so it’ll be resolved and will promise you all I’ll fight whoever the fans want me to fight,” Catterall shared on X.

The clock started ticking on September 22, when the sanctioning body ordered Lopez to defend against Catterall, setting an October 22 cutoff. Lopez took on that mandatory requirement back in August after dethroning Rolando Romero for the Super championship.

Thursday does not mark an automatic verdict from the sanctioning body, though. Letting the date expire without a deal merely hands the decision back to the committee. It will not immediately strip Teofimo, nor does it guarantee an overnight elevation for Catterall.

Word is that Teofimo’s side wants an exemption so they can target a massive unification clash with Ryan Garcia instead. That puts Catterall in a tough spot, waiting to see if his mandatory status actually lands him the marquee name or just sparks another sanctioning headache.

Catterall did the heavy lifting inside the ropes back in May, picking up the secondary strap with a win over Shakhram Giyasov. He handled his business in the ring, but right now the business side is calling the shots.

The split title system creates a mess if Teofimo refuses to engage. Stripping the champion and elevating Catterall to the top spot is certainly on the table, yet the organization hasn’t committed to that route.

Picking up the Super belt via an email upgrade would look nice on his resume, but it robs Catterall of the statement win and the massive check that comes with beating Teofimo in the ring. Handing him the title on paper simply leaves him searching for another dance partner anyway.

His talk about fighting whoever fans pick came up during a back-and-forth about Stevenson, which means he hasn’t officially walked away from chasing Teofimo. The bigger takeaway is that Catterall still cannot lock in a date with anyone.

Catterall sounds less than confident that he’ll get the Teofimo fight. The moment a fighter publicly admits their career is on hold and starts asking the public who they should fight, it sounds like an admission of defeat before the deadline even arrives. Catterallsounds resigned to being bypassed, left holding an upgraded paper title with no marquee scalp to show for it.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing 24/7 Wire

Boxing247.com is an independent boxing news publication covering the sport since 2001. It provides original reporting, fight analysis, schedules, results, and informed coverage of major fighters and events worldwide, backed by more than 25 years of professional boxing journalism.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Calls

Published

on

"Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Calls"

Most Valuable Promotions has formally challenged Lucas Bahdi’s defeat against Floyd Schofield III, petitioning the WBA for an immediate rematch after claiming uncalled knockdowns cost their fighter the vacant lightweight world championship.

The promotional outfit submitted video footage alongside detailed documentation to the WBA following the October 10 clash in Chicago. MVP maintains that if the referee had correctly recognized and scored the disputed incidents, Bahdi would have emerged with a majority decision win instead of leaving the ring empty-handed.

Schofield took the vacant belt by unanimous decision, capturing wide margins on the official cards with scores of 116 to 110, 115 to 111, and a steep 119 to 108. Bahdi’s side now wants the sanctioning body to grant another title opportunity, arguing that multiple officiating blunders corrupted those final numbers.

“The video evidence demonstrates multiple significant officiating errors that directly impacted the outcome of the fight,” MVP said in its statement.

“Our review shows that had these knockdowns been properly ruled and scored, Lucas would have won the WBA lightweight world championship by majority decision.”

That claim sounds bold on paper, yet MVP failed to provide the necessary receipts to back it up. The public release never identified which specific rounds contained the uncalled drops, nor did it offer an adjusted scorecard breakdown to illustrate how Bahdi overturned an eleven-point deficit on the widest card.

Rather than rehashing standard complaints about judges favoring the house fighter, MVP pinned the blame directly on the third man in the ring. The core of their protest argues that referee mistakes prevented the judges from scoring mandatory 10 to 8 rounds, skewing the overall totals.

“We have submitted our findings to the WBA and requested an immediate rematch,” MVP said.

Securing a second fight remains an uphill climb. A rematch forces Schofield to revisit an opponent he already officially conquered, and lodging a protest never guarantees the WBA will order the boxers back into the ring. The sanctioning body has not issued a ruling on the video review, leaving MVP’s victory claim as promotional posturing until officials deliver a verdict.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing News 24 Desk

BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Decision

Published

on

"Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Decision"

Most Valuable Promotions has formally challenged Lucas Bahdi’s defeat against Floyd Schofield III, petitioning the WBA for an immediate rematch after claiming uncalled knockdowns cost their fighter the vacant lightweight world championship.

The promotional outfit submitted video footage alongside detailed documentation to the WBA following the October 10 clash in Chicago. MVP maintains that if the referee had correctly recognized and scored the disputed incidents, Bahdi would have emerged with a majority decision win instead of leaving the ring empty-handed.

Schofield took the vacant belt by unanimous decision, capturing wide margins on the official cards with scores of 116 to 110, 115 to 111, and a steep 119 to 108. Bahdi’s side now wants the sanctioning body to grant another title opportunity, arguing that multiple officiating blunders corrupted those final numbers.

“The video evidence demonstrates multiple significant officiating errors that directly impacted the outcome of the fight,” MVP said in its statement.

“Our review shows that had these knockdowns been properly ruled and scored, Lucas would have won the WBA lightweight world championship by majority decision.”

That claim sounds bold on paper, yet MVP failed to provide the necessary receipts to back it up. The public release never identified which specific rounds contained the uncalled drops, nor did it offer an adjusted scorecard breakdown to illustrate how Bahdi overturned an eleven-point deficit on the widest card.

Rather than rehashing standard complaints about judges favoring the house fighter, MVP pinned the blame directly on the third man in the ring. The core of their protest argues that referee mistakes prevented the judges from scoring mandatory 10 to 8 rounds, skewing the overall totals.

“We have submitted our findings to the WBA and requested an immediate rematch,” MVP said.

Securing a second fight remains an uphill climb. A rematch forces Schofield to revisit an opponent he already officially conquered, and lodging a protest never guarantees the WBA will order the boxers back into the ring. The sanctioning body has not issued a ruling on the video review, leaving MVP’s victory claim as promotional posturing until officials deliver a verdict.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing News 24 Desk

BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending