Boxing
Jack Dempsey Avoids Verdict in Miske Bout: A High-Stakes Escape
Published
1 month agoon

At 22 years of age, Dempsey was tearing through the heavyweight division with his aggressive style and crushing left hook. Miske, 24, had the benefit of fighting before his hometown supporters, but he was far more than a protected local attraction.
Dempsey weighed 187½ pounds, while Miske came in at 182.
Known as the “St. Paul Thunderbolt,” Miske was a fast, clever boxer who understood how to block punches, smother attacks, and work at close range. Those skills gave Dempsey one of his hardest tests during his climb toward Jess Willard’s heavyweight championship.
The local favorite supplied a tactical lesson for smaller fighters facing dangerous punchers. Instead of continually backing away, he stepped into Dempsey’s punching range and crowded him. Retreating would have given Dempsey space to drive forward, build speed, and launch his leaping left hook. Miske took away that leverage by getting close, controlling Dempsey’s arms and preventing him from completing his punches.
The rolling movement associated with Dempsey’s attacks depended upon momentum. He bobbed his upper body from side to side, shifted his weight, and sprang forward with hooks from changing angles. An opponent who backed away gave that attack time to gather force.
Meeting Dempsey chest to chest changed the exchanges into an arm wrestle. His long swings lost much of their force as Miske blocked the hook, jammed the punching arm, and answered with short shots before tying him up.
Quick punches inside prevented the younger man from finding a steady rhythm. Dempsey had productive stretches in the second and third rounds, but Miske answered with a hard right cross in the third.
Years later, Dempsey admitted that Miske was landing more punches and building what looked like a lead. He also recalled being hurt during one exchange and struggling to remain upright until the bell.
“Miske had landed more telling blows than I had,” Dempsey recalled. “He suddenly came at me with a volley that nearly put me out.”
It was a revealing admission from a fighter remembered for overwhelming opponents. Raw aggression had run into a boxer who understood distance, timing and leverage. The visiting fighter finally produced his strongest attack in the seventh. A heavy left to the body followed by a right to the jaw troubled Miske and helped Dempsey recover ground. Neither man scored a knockdown, leaving the newspapers to decide which work they valued more.
Miske’s approach was almost the opposite of the one Jess Willard used against Dempsey in Toledo the following year. The 6’6″ champion tried to control the challenger from long range but remained too upright and stationary.
That distance allowed Dempsey to leap forward with hooks and overhand punches. Willard became an easy target once the challenger closed the distance, leading to seven knockdowns during the savage opening round.
Such a runway was never available against Miske. He moved toward the danger, shortened the punches, and forced Dempsey to work without full leverage. Willard waited at the end of Dempsey’s forward rush, while Miske intercepted it before the punches reached full speed.
The St. Paul fight showed that smothering Dempsey was safer than surrendering the ring and waiting for him to attack. Gene Tunney receives credit for solving Dempsey in 1926 and repeating the result one year later. Miske had exposed several of the same weaknesses eight years earlier. Their tactics were not identical. Tunney relied more heavily on footwork, his jab, and movement at long range. Miske was more willing to hold his position, work inside, and smother Dempsey physically.
Both remained composed when Dempsey attacked. They refused to become stationary targets at his preferred distance and punished him when his forward movement became predictable.
Before their first fight, Tunney studied films of Dempsey and brought former opponents and sparring partners into camp. There is no firm evidence that Miske personally supplied Tunney’s plan, but the St. Paul contest had established the central principle: Dempsey became less effective when an opponent denied him momentum and forced him to restart his attacks.
Miske supplied the early evidence that denying Dempsey momentum made him less effective, and Tunney later produced the polished championship version.
The St. Paul Pioneer Press surveyed eight writers at ringside. Four favored Dempsey, one selected Miske and three scored the fight even. The newspaper published the bout as a draw, although other reports awarded Dempsey a narrow newspaper decision based on his aggression and heavier punches.
A later collection drawing upon additional newspaper sources produced seven verdicts for Dempsey, four draws and one for Miske. That broader tally included reports beyond the eight writers questioned in St. Paul.
Such disagreement exposed the weakness of the no decision era. A boxer’s official record remained untouched after a distance fight, even when most observers believed he had lost. Local sports editors became unofficial judges without a uniform scoring system or any requirement to agree.
Reports from St. Paul do not support the claim that hometown writers simply protected Miske. Four of the eight surveyed writers favored the visiting Dempsey, while only one selected Miske. Regional loyalty may have influenced individual accounts, but the split also reflected a genuinely close fight.
Miske landed more often and controlled long portions of the contest, while Dempsey delivered the harder individual blows. Some writers valued activity and craft; others favored aggression and damage.
Promoters benefited from the uncertainty. Dempsey survived a difficult night without receiving an official loss, allowing his handlers to continue selling him as the next threat to Willard. Miske also avoided a formal defeat and remained a leading heavyweight attraction in Minnesota. Jack Kearns wanted knockouts that would sell Dempsey to a national audience. Taking him into Miske’s hometown against a fast, experienced boxer was a serious gamble.
The no decision format reduced the danger because only a knockout placed an official loss on the record. It did not remove the promotional risk. A decisive beating reported across the country still would have damaged Dempsey’s growing reputation.
Kearns learned that clever defensive fighters presented a different challenge from the large, slower heavyweights Dempsey destroyed. His fighter continued facing dangerous opposition, including Fred Fulton, Battling Levinsky, Bill Brennan and Miske himself, but the first fight supplied a warning. Dempsey’s power did not automatically solve every style.
The pair met again in Philadelphia on November 28, 1918, with most newspapers favoring Dempsey after six rounds. By then, the future champion had gained more experience against Miske’s troublesome methods.
Their third fight came on September 6, 1920, after Dempsey had taken the heavyweight championship from Willard. Miske was suffering from Bright’s disease and was knocked out in the third round of Dempsey’s first title defense.
His illness was not common public knowledge, so there is no basis for claiming Kearns selected Miske because he knew the challenger was dying. In hindsight, the physical decline made the title fight far less dangerous than their first meeting had been.
That knockout became the lasting image of their rivalry. Miske is now remembered primarily as the sick challenger who needed money, while Dempsey remains one of boxing’s most recognizable champions.
The familiar family story belongs mainly to the end of Miske’s life, not the 1920 title fight. A gravely ill Miske returned against Bill Brennan in November 1923, scored a fourth-round knockout, and used the money to give his family a memorable Christmas. He died on January 1, 1924.
Remembering only the tragedy reduces Miske to a sympathetic opponent in Dempsey’s championship story. Reports from 1918 present the fuller picture.
At that time, the St. Paul Thunderbolt was one of the sharpest technical boxers in the heavyweight division, possessing the timing, defense, and composure to frustrate Dempsey near his physical peak. He survived 10 rounds and forced the future champion to abandon many of his preferred attacks. The press left St. Paul unable to agree on a winner.
BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy, clarity, and reliable sourcing.
You may like
Boxing
Filip Hrgovic to Moses Itauma: No Time for Crying in Boxing Showdown
Published
2 hours agoon
October 18, 2026
Filip Hrgovic is having a grand time talking down to Moses Itauma. As the young heavyweight mopes over his first defeat and fixates on replays, Hrgovic delivered a blunt reality check: stop crying, get back in the gym, and figure out how to win when your opponent refuses to fall over.
Itauma admitted this week that rewatching the bout eats away at him. He landed his best artillery, watched Hrgovic walk straight through it, and kept winging power shots until his gas tank emptied completely. He sounds like a fighter in denial, still convinced the knockout was right there if he had just thrown a little harder.
Hrgovic responded with dripping condescension, offering to comfort the 21-year-old prospect like a disappointed toddler.
“I’ll tell him, ‘Look, Moses, everything will be good,’” Hrgovic told The Stomping Ground. “I will cuddle him … on the head, like, ‘Moses, everything will be good. Don’t be upset.’”
The mocking humor carried an unforgiving point. Hrgovic pointed out that a loss should light a fire under a fighter rather than shatter his nerve, before making sure to remind everyone who dismantled the hype train.
“You must learn from that that you can’t knock out Filip Hrgovic,” he said. “You must learn you can’t knock out everyone. You must be ready for a 12-round fight.”
That diagnosis is right on the money. Itauma got exposed by his own reliance on early blowouts. Once his power failed to create a shortcut, he had no Plan B, frantically emptying his reserves against an immovable target walking him down.
Surviving at the top level means knowing how to bank rounds without punching yourself into exhaustion. Itauma needs to accept that durable heavyweights will absorb his Sunday punch and keep coming.
Hrgovic threw in obligatory compliments about Itauma’s raw speed, but the core message was pure dismissal.
“No time for crying. Go back to the gym, and that’s it, man. Simple.”
Staring at the tape will not undo the beating. Itauma either learns how to box when the stoppage vanishes, or the next seasoned heavyweight will run the exact same script on him.

About the author
Boxing News 24 Desk
BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.
Boxing
Heavyweight Champion Calls for Fabio Wardleys Retirement After Dubois Loss Due to Concerns Over Damage
Published
6 hours agoon
October 18, 2026
Fabio Wardley has been advised to retire, due to both his second-round stoppage defeat to Daniel Dubois and the overall damage he has incurred in recent years.
The 31-year-old returned to action yesterday evening, attempting to reclaim his WBO title after suffering a punishing 11th-round stoppage defeat to Dubois in May.
Wardley did, of course, manage to score two early knockdowns but, for the rest of their contest, the momentum was firmly in his opponent’s favour.
Many therefore made Dubois a sizable favourite ahead of their rematch, which saw a role reversal as it was the 29-year-old, this time, who floored his man within the first 20 seconds.
Somehow, Wardley regained his footing but was placed under increasing pressure, with his corner throwing in the towel following a sustained onslaught from Dubois.
As a result, Dubois retained his world heavyweight title and is now eager to secure a unification match, while the immediate future for Wardley seems far less obvious.
Speaking to Boxing Newsthough, IBF champion Filip Hrgovic said the Ipswich man should leave the sport while, financially, he is in a position to do so.
“I think he should retire. He didn’t look good; he made [a] bunch of money … he did miracle – he became world champion without amateur career.
“He received a lot of damage in his last five [to] six fights, and he should retire and enjoy [his life].
“Daniel Dubois start normal, with the jab – he didn’t do anything special. Wardley just wasn’t in a [good] place from the beginning.”
Indeed, very few expected that Wardley, who had just four white collar fights before turning professional, would go on to become a world champion.
Boxing
Terence Crawford Discusses Christian Mbillis Potential to Defeat Canelo Alvarez
Published
6 hours agoon
October 18, 2026
Terence Crawford has advised Christian Mbilli on what tactics to implement against Canelo Alvarezwith the two super-middleweights expected to collide on October 31.
Or at least, that seems to be the plan, with many surprised that the event is still going ahead in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where the airport has been under attack in recent weeks.
A cancellation could therefore be on the cards but, if it does take place later this month, then Canelo will have the chance to reclaim his WBC title.
The Mexican lost his undisputed crown via a unanimous decision defeat to Crawfordwho moved up two weight divisions and produced a masterful performance in September 2025.
All four titles then became vacant following his retirement a few months later, with Mbilli getting upgraded from ‘interim’ to full WBC champion at 168lbs.
He too has not fought for over a year, as the Frenchman’s 10-round draw with Lester Martinez arrived on the Canelo-Crawford undercard.
But while both men are contending with a lack of activity, Canelo – based on his experience and superior skills – is widely considered to have the edge over Mbilli.
Speaking on the DAZN broadcast this weekend, Crawford agreed with the general consensus and, while not believing he can actually win the fight, has implored Mbilli to adopt a high-volume and rugged approach.
“Styles make fights, and his [Mbilli’s] style is tailor-made for Canelo. He can’t do nothing but press Canelo. I can’t see him beating Canelo in a boxing match.
“I think his best success will be letting his hands go, roughing Canelo up and making it a dog fight.”
It does, indeed, appear that Mbilli’s best option is to make it a battle of attrition, while Canelo may look to outbox his five-years-younger opponent.
Filip Hrgovic to Moses Itauma: No Time for Crying in Boxing Showdown
Movsar Evloev thinks UFC 333 fight with Alexander Volkanovski could be 1st UFC finish: ‘Why not?’
Henry Cejudo: Alex Pereira has skipped lines long enough
Trending
-
Boxing2 days agoTim Bradley Calls Out Biggest Duck in Boxing for Devin Haney vs Shakur Stevenson Collapse
-
Boxing2 days agoDubois vs Wardley 2: Heavyweights Clash at Career Heavies for World Title Rematch
-
Boxing2 days agoDevin Haney Targets Key Opponent Following Shakur Stevenson Fight Talks Breakdown
-
MMA2 days agoKayla Harrison says she might not have returned without Amanda Nunes
-
MMA2 days agoUFC Edmonton preview show: Are Mike Malott, Joaquin Buckley in must-win territory?
-
Boxing2 days agoBam Rodriguez Proposes March Fight, But Inoue Eyes New Opportunities
-
Boxing2 days agoFabio Wardleys Team Advocates for Strict Foul Monitoring Against Daniel Dubois
-
Boxing2 days agoMannix and Mora Support Fabio Wardley in Quest for Vengeance


