OMAHA, Neb. – World champion boxing champion Terence Crawford’s security chief and two others filed a federal lawsuit Monday against the Omaha police chief and more than a dozen officers for their conduct during a September traffic stop.
Crawford, an Omaha native, was arrested early Sept. 28 on reckless driving charges after a parade was held in downtown Omaha two weeks earlier to celebrate his victory over Canelo Alvarez. Police ordered Crawford, security guard Qasim Shabazz and two other passengers to exit the vehicle at gunpoint.
Crawford, who was ticketed and fired, is not a plaintiff in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Nebraska. The City Hall was contacted for comment.
Shabazz and the other passengers in the vehicle, George Williams and Nadia Metoyer, are seeking monetary damages.
According to Shabazz and the police report, Shabazz told the officer who approached the vehicle that he was carrying a legal firearm because his security job required it. According to the lawsuit, three seconds after Shabazz’s disclosure, officers on the driver’s and passenger’s sides ordered everyone out of the vehicle at gunpoint.
Police Chief Todd Schmaderer, in a statement hours after the incident, said Crawford, who was leaning over the car’s console, told the officer on the passenger side that he also had a legal firearm, but the officer sitting in the driver’s side window did not hear the exchange.
The officer sitting on the driver’s side then noticed Crawford’s handgun on the floor and reached for the gun with the other officer. All four people exited the vehicle without incident. The lawsuit alleges that all four were handcuffed for 30 minutes. Schmaderer said they were handcuffed for 10 minutes.
Police confirmed that all passengers in the vehicle were legally permitted to possess firearms.
The lawsuit alleges that the officers violated the constitutional rights of Shabazz, Williams and Metoyer for drawing and pointing guns at them after Shabazz legally disclosed his weapon. Schmaderer said officers followed department policy. The lawsuit claims the policy violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against excessive force.
The plaintiffs also allege, among other things, that police have a habit of making discriminatory arrests of black people and are not adequately trained on constitutional restrictions on the exploit of force when encountering citizens legally possessing firearms.
The lawsuit seeks compensation for physical, emotional, mental and dignity damage suffered as a direct result of the officers’ conduct.