Boxing
Shakur Stevenson Responds to Shannon Sharpes Boring Comments with Passionate Rebuttal
Published
3 months agoon

Shakur completely missed a golden opportunity to handle that situation with some poise. When a fighter gets that rattled, it proves the criticism is hitting a little too close to home.
The exchange centered on a debate that has followed Stevenson throughout his career. Sharpe acknowledged Shakur’s skill but argued that his defensive approach does little to entertain casual fans.
“Your style is boring,” Sharpe told Stevenson. “The most exciting fight was against Teo… You take an F for boxing entertainment.”
Shakur immediately rejected the criticism, insisting Sharpe was not qualified to judge his style.
“You’re ignorant to boxing,” Shakur replied. “That’s how I know you never boxed before. You don’t have a degree in boxing.”
Instead of addressing the fan perspective Sharpe was coming from, Shakur reacted by trying to invalidate Sharpe’s right to have an opinion at all, relying on the old “you never laced up the gloves” argument.
Stevenson dismissed Sharpe’s criticism by repeatedly calling the Hall of Fame tight end “ignorant” about boxing. He argued that someone who had never boxed was not qualified to judge his style, even comparing the discussion to criticizing soccer legend Lionel Messi without understanding the sport.
Sharpe stood by his opinion, making clear he was judging Shakur from the perspective of a fan rather than a fighter.
Sharpe refused to change his opinion, telling Stevenson that technical ability and entertainment aren’t the same thing. Stevenson fired back by repeatedly calling Sharpe “ignorant” and insisting he didn’t know enough about boxing to criticize his style.
It is not just casual viewers who complain. A huge chunk of the hardcore boxing community feels the exact same way. People respect the technical wizardry, but nobody wants to spend hard-earned money to watch a twelve-round safety-first clinic where the priority is strictly avoiding engagement.
By blowing his top and calling Sharpe ignorant, Shakur actually made things much worse for his own brand. It highlighted his massive insecurity regarding his marketability. Deep down, he knows that this exact reputation is what prevents him from becoming a genuine pay-per-view superstar.
If you are truly confident in your craft, you laugh it off. You do not shout about boxing degrees to a football legend who is simply echoing what millions of fans say every time you step into the ring.

You may like
Boxing
Jack Catterall Reveals Career Standstill: Whats Next for the Boxing Star?
Published
3 hours agoon
October 20, 2026
Jack Catterall finds himself waiting on the sidelines while his pursuit of Teofimo Lopez hangs in the air. With Thursday’s negotiation deadline closing in fast, the WBA regular welterweight titleholder admitted publicly that his career is paused.
Addressing questions on social media about potentially taking on Shakur StevensonCatterall made it clear he intends to give the public what they want once his immediate path clears up. Still, he stopped short of promising that Lopez would be standing across from him next.
“My career is currently on hold but in the next week or so it’ll be resolved and will promise you all I’ll fight whoever the fans want me to fight,” Catterall shared on X.
The clock started ticking on September 22, when the sanctioning body ordered Lopez to defend against Catterall, setting an October 22 cutoff. Lopez took on that mandatory requirement back in August after dethroning Rolando Romero for the Super championship.
Thursday does not mark an automatic verdict from the sanctioning body, though. Letting the date expire without a deal merely hands the decision back to the committee. It will not immediately strip Teofimo, nor does it guarantee an overnight elevation for Catterall.
Word is that Teofimo’s side wants an exemption so they can target a massive unification clash with Ryan Garcia instead. That puts Catterall in a tough spot, waiting to see if his mandatory status actually lands him the marquee name or just sparks another sanctioning headache.
Catterall did the heavy lifting inside the ropes back in May, picking up the secondary strap with a win over Shakhram Giyasov. He handled his business in the ring, but right now the business side is calling the shots.
The split title system creates a mess if Teofimo refuses to engage. Stripping the champion and elevating Catterall to the top spot is certainly on the table, yet the organization hasn’t committed to that route.
Picking up the Super belt via an email upgrade would look nice on his resume, but it robs Catterall of the statement win and the massive check that comes with beating Teofimo in the ring. Handing him the title on paper simply leaves him searching for another dance partner anyway.
His talk about fighting whoever fans pick came up during a back-and-forth about Stevenson, which means he hasn’t officially walked away from chasing Teofimo. The bigger takeaway is that Catterall still cannot lock in a date with anyone.
Catterall sounds less than confident that he’ll get the Teofimo fight. The moment a fighter publicly admits their career is on hold and starts asking the public who they should fight, it sounds like an admission of defeat before the deadline even arrives. Catterallsounds resigned to being bypassed, left holding an upgraded paper title with no marquee scalp to show for it.
About the author
Boxing 24/7 Wire
Boxing247.com is an independent boxing news publication covering the sport since 2001. It provides original reporting, fight analysis, schedules, results, and informed coverage of major fighters and events worldwide, backed by more than 25 years of professional boxing journalism.
Boxing
Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Calls
Published
6 hours agoon
October 19, 2026
Most Valuable Promotions has formally challenged Lucas Bahdi’s defeat against Floyd Schofield III, petitioning the WBA for an immediate rematch after claiming uncalled knockdowns cost their fighter the vacant lightweight world championship.
The promotional outfit submitted video footage alongside detailed documentation to the WBA following the October 10 clash in Chicago. MVP maintains that if the referee had correctly recognized and scored the disputed incidents, Bahdi would have emerged with a majority decision win instead of leaving the ring empty-handed.
Schofield took the vacant belt by unanimous decision, capturing wide margins on the official cards with scores of 116 to 110, 115 to 111, and a steep 119 to 108. Bahdi’s side now wants the sanctioning body to grant another title opportunity, arguing that multiple officiating blunders corrupted those final numbers.
“The video evidence demonstrates multiple significant officiating errors that directly impacted the outcome of the fight,” MVP said in its statement.
“Our review shows that had these knockdowns been properly ruled and scored, Lucas would have won the WBA lightweight world championship by majority decision.”
That claim sounds bold on paper, yet MVP failed to provide the necessary receipts to back it up. The public release never identified which specific rounds contained the uncalled drops, nor did it offer an adjusted scorecard breakdown to illustrate how Bahdi overturned an eleven-point deficit on the widest card.
Rather than rehashing standard complaints about judges favoring the house fighter, MVP pinned the blame directly on the third man in the ring. The core of their protest argues that referee mistakes prevented the judges from scoring mandatory 10 to 8 rounds, skewing the overall totals.
“We have submitted our findings to the WBA and requested an immediate rematch,” MVP said.
Securing a second fight remains an uphill climb. A rematch forces Schofield to revisit an opponent he already officially conquered, and lodging a protest never guarantees the WBA will order the boxers back into the ring. The sanctioning body has not issued a ruling on the video review, leaving MVP’s victory claim as promotional posturing until officials deliver a verdict.

About the author
Boxing News 24 Desk
BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.
Boxing
Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Decision
Published
6 hours agoon
October 19, 2026
Most Valuable Promotions has formally challenged Lucas Bahdi’s defeat against Floyd Schofield III, petitioning the WBA for an immediate rematch after claiming uncalled knockdowns cost their fighter the vacant lightweight world championship.
The promotional outfit submitted video footage alongside detailed documentation to the WBA following the October 10 clash in Chicago. MVP maintains that if the referee had correctly recognized and scored the disputed incidents, Bahdi would have emerged with a majority decision win instead of leaving the ring empty-handed.
Schofield took the vacant belt by unanimous decision, capturing wide margins on the official cards with scores of 116 to 110, 115 to 111, and a steep 119 to 108. Bahdi’s side now wants the sanctioning body to grant another title opportunity, arguing that multiple officiating blunders corrupted those final numbers.
“The video evidence demonstrates multiple significant officiating errors that directly impacted the outcome of the fight,” MVP said in its statement.
“Our review shows that had these knockdowns been properly ruled and scored, Lucas would have won the WBA lightweight world championship by majority decision.”
That claim sounds bold on paper, yet MVP failed to provide the necessary receipts to back it up. The public release never identified which specific rounds contained the uncalled drops, nor did it offer an adjusted scorecard breakdown to illustrate how Bahdi overturned an eleven-point deficit on the widest card.
Rather than rehashing standard complaints about judges favoring the house fighter, MVP pinned the blame directly on the third man in the ring. The core of their protest argues that referee mistakes prevented the judges from scoring mandatory 10 to 8 rounds, skewing the overall totals.
“We have submitted our findings to the WBA and requested an immediate rematch,” MVP said.
Securing a second fight remains an uphill climb. A rematch forces Schofield to revisit an opponent he already officially conquered, and lodging a protest never guarantees the WBA will order the boxers back into the ring. The sanctioning body has not issued a ruling on the video review, leaving MVP’s victory claim as promotional posturing until officials deliver a verdict.

About the author
Boxing News 24 Desk
BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.
Jack Catterall Reveals Career Standstill: Whats Next for the Boxing Star?
Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Decision
Lucas Bahdi Calls for Schofield Rematch After Controversial Knockdown Calls
Trending
-
Boxing2 days agoTerence Crawford Discusses Christian Mbillis Potential to Defeat Canelo Alvarez
-
Boxing2 days agoTyson Fury Analyzes Daniel Dubois Knockout Victory Against Fabio Wardley
-
MMA2 days agoHenry Cejudo: Alex Pereira has skipped lines long enough
-
Boxing2 days agoDerek Chisora Urges Moses Itauma to Battle KO Artist Heavyweight in Comeback
-
Boxing2 days agoHeavyweight Champion Calls for Fabio Wardleys Retirement After Dubois Loss Due to Concerns Over Damage
-
MMA2 days agoMovsar Evloev thinks UFC 333 fight with Alexander Volkanovski could be 1st UFC finish: ‘Why not?’
-
Boxing2 days agoFilip Hrgovic to Moses Itauma: No Time for Crying in Boxing Showdown
-
Boxing2 days agoSebastian Fundora Insists on Equal Split with Jaron Ennis in Upcoming Fight Negotiations


