Connect with us

Boxing

Mike Tyson vs. George Foreman: Larry Holmes predicts he will win in ‘two seconds’

Published

on

Mike Tyson vs George Foreman: Larry Holmes predicts one would win in ‘two seconds’

Larry Holmes didn’t mince his words when asked who would win the Mike Tyson vs. George Foreman fight.

In terms of fantasy matchups, many pointed out that a heavyweight bout between Tyson and Foreman was one that would provide nothing but fireworks stylistically.

Holmes, of course I had the misfortune of experiencing the full force of “Iron Mike” at a time when the 21-year-old seemed almost invincible.

By contrast, Holmes was well past his prime at age 38, so it wasn’t much of a surprise when he suffered a fourth-round defeat in 1988.

During this time, Tyson defended his WBC world title four times, which he won after a two-round knockout of Trevor Berbick in 1986.

Then, after defeating Holmes with three major titles, the powerful boxer suffered a shocking loss to James “Buster” Douglas just over two years later.

But while this version of Tyson was indeed a force to be reckoned with, Holmes suspects the Brooklyn fighter would have faced several obstacles in a fight with Foreman.

In fact, the heavyweight legend doubts his former foe would have lasted more than two seconds in a fight against “Substantial George,” whose peak occurred around 1973.

Foreman then made a monumental statement against Joe Frazier, stopping him in the second round before losing to Muhammad Ali in October 1974.

In an interview titled Sky Sports show in the ringHolmes was quick to suggest that this version of Foreman would have led to an even more devastating result against Tyson.

“George Foreman – two seconds. He hit too difficult. You have to box George, yes [Muhammad] Ali did it the way I would have done it.

“You can’t stand there with George Foreman and take punches. George will rip your head off. I mean, ‘Bang! Bang!’

“It’s like the kitchen sink hitting you with it.”

There are rumors that a fight between Tyson and Foreman was negotiated in the early 1990s, but it never materialized, with Tyson’s shocking loss to James “Buster” Douglas playing a immense role.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boxing

Janibek Alimkhanuly Shifts Perspective on Hamzah Sheeraz: A New Dynamic in Boxing

Published

on

"Janibek Alimkhanuly Shifts Perspective on Hamzah Sheeraz: A New Dynamic in Boxing"

Janibek Alimkhanuly spent months trying to get Hamzah Sheeraz into the ring. Now that Sheeraz has vacated his WBO super middleweight title, Janibek is asking fans to stop saying the former champion ran from him. That is generous. It also leaves Janibek with less to say about a fight he wanted badly.

Janibek’s tone has changed since the purse bid. He was eager to fight, said money was not his priority, and publicly pushed Sheeraz to accept. Queensberry then bid $1,001,809 to stage the ordered defense, beating Top Rank’s $820,000 offer. Sheeraz’s 75 percent share would have been roughly $751,000. Days later, he gave up the belt.

That sequence deserves a closer look. Queensberry put a serious number on the fight, so the bid itself cannot be dismissed as proof that nobody valued it. But winning the right to promote a title defense means little to fans when the champion vacates before it happens.

Sheeraz has objected to Janibek receiving a mandatory shot after his failed drug test. He is entitled to explain that position. Fans are equally entitled to ask why the issue reached a purse bid before he surrendered the title. Janibek’s post supplies no answer.

Perhaps Janibek sees no benefit in branding Sheeraz a coward. Doing so would also make the opponent he chased sound less valuable. Calling Sheeraz a great fighter preserves the idea that this was an important contest, even after the belt and the fight slipped away.

The respect between them may be sincere. Janibek still gets no Sheeraz fight, and Sheeraz no longer has to defend his title against Janibek. A friendly photo does not change either result.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing 24/7 Wire

Boxing247.com is an independent boxing news publication covering the sport since 2001. It provides original reporting, fight analysis, schedules, results, and informed coverage of major fighters and events worldwide, backed by more than 25 years of professional boxing journalism.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Virginia Confirms Decision to Erase Prichard Colón Loss from Records

Published

on

Virginia Confirms Decision to Erase Prichard Colón Loss from Records

Virginia has given World Boxing News its final answer on whether Prichard Colón’s last professional defeat can still be challenged, bringing an end to WBN’s long fight to have the result annulled and removed from his record.

WBN has pursued the possibility of changing the controversial disqualification defeat to Terrel Williams, with those efforts continuing following Colón’s death at age 33.

Virginia’s Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation previously explained that a decision can only be overturned if there is proven collusion, a scorecard error, or a regulatory violation that affected the result.

WBN pressed Eric Beidel, Communications & Digital Media Manager for the Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation, on whether any avenue remained to challenge the decision.

“And on that final question … as mentioned before, a decision can only be overturned if there is proven collusion, a scorecard error, or a regulatory violation that affected the results,” Beidel graciously responded after providing WBN with transparent answers throughout the investigation.

“In addition, a complaint about a regulatory violation must be filed within three years of the alleged violation.”

The Colón-Williams fight took place on October 17, 2015, meaning that deadline expired years ago.

Virginia Closes Appeal Route

Virginia’s response also addressed whether the result could instead be challenged through an appeal.

“The Administrative Process Act (APA) does create appeal rights to case decisions, but because DPOR never received a complaint in this instance, there was no case or decision that could be appealed under the APA.”

The deadline for filing a complaint about a regulatory violation has expired, while the absence of an original complaint means there is no case decision available to appeal under the APA.

For WBN, Virginia’s response ends a long fight to have the defeat annulled and removed from Colón’s professional record.

Premier Boxing Champions | PBC on NBC

WBN’s Fight for Prichard Colón

It is no secret that WBN and Prichard were close before the most tragic night of his career ended all contact and left us on the outside for the years leading up to his death.

That never stopped WBN from reporting on Prichard, campaigning for change and hoping lessons from what happened to him could help prevent another fighter and family from enduring the same tragedy.

Virginia’s final response may end WBN’s attempts to have the result changed, but it does not end our commitment to Prichard.

Prichard Colón will not be forgotten.

WBN will continue to keep his name alive whenever and wherever possible with the WBN Boxer Pageand push to ensure his fight for life and everything that happened in its aftermath are never allowed to simply disappear from boxing’s memory.

This investigation ends here, but Prichard’s story does not.


About the Author

Phil Jay is the Editor-in-Chief of World Boxing News (WBN), a BWAA-acknowledged boxing news website founded in 2010. A veteran boxing reporter with 16 years of experience, he has interviewed world champions, broken international exclusives, and reported ringside from major events. His work is published worldwide through WBN and distributed on platforms including Apple News.

Read Phil Jay’s full bio and latest stories.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Terence Crawford Dismisses Ryan Garcias Fight Claims with a Laughter

Published

on

"Terence Crawford Dismisses Ryan Garcia's Fight Claims with a Laughter"

Terence Crawford seems to have learned about his supposed December 11 fight with Ryan Garcia the same way everyone else did: by reading Mike Coppinger’s post. His reaction was short enough to say plenty.

“Dam what I miss?” Crawford posted on X after Coppinger named him and Ryan as a possible replacement attraction if Tyson Fury’s fight with Anthony Joshua falls apart.

Dan Rafael joined the replies: “You’re fighting Ryan Garcia Dec 11 apparently 😂”

Crawford answered with laughing emojis and a question: “dam am I? Why I don’t know about this?”

That exchange doesn’t tell us what Coppinger’s sources heard. It does make the idea of a December fight look awfully thin from Crawford’s side. If he’s joking about learning of it online, nobody has given him a date to put on his calendar.

The claim arrived during a strange evening for the Fury–Joshua promotion. Coppinger reported that their December 11 fight in Cardiff could be called off because of unresolved issues, with Crawford against Ryan floated as an alternative. He then raised Tyson Fury against David Benavidez as another possibility. At that point, the proposed replacements began to sound like someone pulling names from different weight classes out of a hat.

Ryan’s situation hardly makes Crawford a simple substitute. Ryan has discussed fighting Isaac Cruz in December, while Crawford announced his retirement last year. Putting them together would require more than clearing a date on a broadcast schedule.

Crawford didn’t explicitly rule out ever fighting Ryan. He laughed at the suggestion that he was already fighting him on December 11. Until the fighters themselves have something firmer to say, that’s the distinction worth keeping.

This shows complete desperation and pure amateurism behind the scenes. When an A-side pound-for-pound star finds out he is supposedly headlining a stadium event in ten weeks by reading social media gossip on his phone, the entire promotion is flying blind.

Promoters and mouthpieces are throwing wild scenarios at the wall, hoping something sticks because the main event is on life support. The real story here is the absolute mess of Tyson Fury against Anthony Joshua. The moment that fight hit contractual trouble over promotional politics, the power brokers panicked. Instead of fixing their heavyweight headache, someone leaked absurd backup options to buy time and control the narrative.

Floating Crawford against Ryan in Cardiff makes zero practical sense. British fight fans bought tickets for a massive domestic clash between two heavyweights who have spent five years posturing. Staging two American box-office draws in a stadium in Wales in the middle of December is total fantasy. On top of that, Crawford retired after conquering Canelo Alvarez and is not sitting around waiting to jump into a two-month training camp.

You do not wake up an elite technician of Crawford’s caliber and demand he cut weight to fight a dangerous puncher without serious, months-long contractual discussions. Floating Fury against David Benavidez right after only exposed how ridiculous the rumor mill had become. Promoters need to stop floating make-believe backup fights using retired legends and focus on getting their heavyweights to honor their agreements.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing 24/7 Wire

Boxing247.com is an independent boxing news publication covering the sport since 2001. It provides original reporting, fight analysis, schedules, results, and informed coverage of major fighters and events worldwide, backed by more than 25 years of professional boxing journalism.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending