Connect with us

Boxing

Michael Spinks Celebrates 70 Years of Greatness in Light Heavyweight Boxing

Published

on

"Michael Spinks Celebrates 70 Years of Greatness in Light Heavyweight Boxing"
Add East Side Boxing as a preferred source on Google

Follow East Side Boxing on Google News

A superb Olympian, Spinks, along with little bro Leon, won gold in 1976. Going pro in April of 1977, Spinks was soon bamboozling good fighters with his unpredictable, herky-jerky, hard to nail style. Fast, possessing a high ring IQ, and with Spinks showing real power in his “Jinx” of a right hand, the 20-something was soon seeing off men like Tom Bethea, Murray Sutherland, Yaqui Lopez, and Marvin Johnson.

This was superb work for a fast-moving contender. Then, in July of 1981, in what was just his 17th fight, Spinks unseated Eddie Mustafa Muhammad to take the WBA 175 pound title, Spinks dropping Muhammad late and winning a unanimous decision. Title retentions, an impressive 10 in total, would come against the likes of: Vonzell Johnson, Sutherland in a rematch, Johnny Davis, and, in a big unification clash, Dwight Muhammad Qawi.

Spinks was brilliant against the dangerous “Camden Buzzsaw,” and he was now perhaps the best pound-for-pound boxer out there. But Spinks wanted ultimate glory, and that would come, he knew, up at heavyweight. After four defences of his two belts, with Spinks also picking up the inaugural IBF strap along the way, the 29 year old set about building up his body ahead of his invasion of the heavyweight division. Spinks bulked up to around 200 pounds and, in September of 1985, having declined to take a heavyweight test beforehand, Spinks upset the great Larry Holmes to make history. Spinks won a controversial split decision over Holmes (one that sent Holmes into crazy mode, his infamous post-fight speech proving both hilarious and shocking), with him becoming the first man in history to have moved up from 175 to claim the world heavyweight crown. In terms of belts, Spinks had won the IBF title, this the sole title Holmes had had at the time (Larry having decided to fight exclusively for the new organisation). But Spinks had beaten THE man and he was now the man at heavyweight.

Spinks repeated the win over a still irate Holmes the following April, the rematch also closely decided on the three cards. But Spinks had proven his earlier win was no fluke. Later, an easy defence logged against Steffen Tangstad, Spinks was stripped of his IBF belt for not next facing Tony Tucker. Spinks, with the savvy Butch Lewis guiding him, preferred a bigger payday/easier fight against a rusty Gerry Cooney. Spinks destroyed Cooney over the course of five one-sided rounds in June of 1987.

But there was now a new star of the heavyweight division, his name being Mike Tyson. Tyson had scooped up the WBC, WBA and IBF belts in double-quick fashion, and there was just one man left to fight. Spinks, the linear champ, had no choice. The payday proved staggering, for both Tyson and Spinks, but the fight itself was no fight.

Where was the fearless Spinks who had swapped punches with terrors like Muhammad and Qawi? Nobody knows. Spinks, rattled and unnerved like never before, wore a bemused, some said flat-out terrified facial expression as he awaited the ring entrance of Tyson. It was as we know, all over in 91-seconds.

Spinks would forever be 31-1, and also a fixture on Tyson’s highlight reel. It was a sad way for such a great fighter to go out, but Spinks went out with his health, his money, and with him knowing that he made a big slice of boxing history during his career.

Today, plenty of boxing historians rank Spinks in the Top 5 greatest ever 175-pounders.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boxing

Navarrete vs Foster: Title Unification Predictions and Analysis

Published

on

Navarrete vs Foster: Title Unification Predictions and Analysis

Navarrete vs Foster: Recent Form

Remember when people thought Emanuel Navarrete was on his way down or even out? “Vaquero” had joked about eating Twinkies during training. He drew with Robson Conceicao. He lost to Denys Berinchyk. He got a nutritionist.

In his last three fights, Navarrete has dominated Oscar Valdez (again), had a tough one and some controversy in a no-contest with Charly Suarez, and dominated and stopped Eduardo “Sugar” Nunez. He’s looked like he’s back to peak form Emanuel Navarrete, and peak form Emanuel Navarrete is a problem.

The “Twinkies” stuff is in the past, though like many things, it will probably hang around him forever in fight build-ups. The version of Navarrete we saw against Nunez is one of the sport’s better fighters.

But he is beatable. We’ve seen it. And it wasn’t long ago. The Suarez fight was another reminder that he’s far from flawless. If Navarrete has a tough opponent, it will be a tough fight, as fights with tough opponents ought to be.

Foster is one of my favorite boxing stories of recent years, a good-but-not-great prospect in the mid-2010s who suffered a couple of losses on ShoBox in eight-rounders and looked like maybe the bubble had burst on him. He might fight on, but we wouldn’t hear much. Maybe he’d return to ShoBox in the B-side role sometime. Instead, he reset his career, got better, moved down to 130, and in 2023, won his first world title, seven years after his second loss, battling back from square one to do it.

O’Shaquie is 15-1 since his two losses in 2015-16. His only loss since came to Robson Conceicao, who has been tough as hell for anyone at 130/135 other than Shakur Stevenson and Raymond Muratalla, and the latter might have had more to do with the fact that Conceicao was 37 by then. Foster also avenged his loss to Conceicao and comes into this one, as Navarrete does, in fine form in his most recent outings, beating Stephen Fulton and Raymond Ford.

We’ve got a good fight on our hands with two guys who have looked good in their recent fights and, at 31 (Navarrete) and 33 (Foster), still look to be right in their prime years.

Navarrete vs Foster: Style Matchup

A disclaimer in the interest of transparency: I find “Vaquero” fascinating and almost certainly had my mind made up before I booted up the tape.

A lot’s been made of how Navarrete “gets away” with fighting “wrong” thanks to his motor, power, durability, and freakish proportions. His last time out against “Sugar” Nunez, the commentators quipped that nobody in their right mind would train someone to fight that way. These people are, to be blunt, wrong as hell; he’s an excellent case study in maximizing one’s natural gifts and doesn’t get nearly enough credit for his craft. Watch the Nunez fight and take note of how well he controls distance, how often he’s just a hair too far away for Nunez’s counters, the way he threads punches between Nunez’s volleys, the exploitation of his dramatic step-ins to get Nunez biting on feints, the genuinely solid defensive movement and arm placement that follow his lunges. Crude as a lot of his punches are and as…let’s say “improvisational” his footwork is, there’s a system there. Yes, he does stupid shit, but he does it smartly.

This puts him in delightful contrast with Foster, who’s among the most textbook sweet scientists in the game. A human highlight reel he is not, but after our last few prediction pieces, do you know how refreshing it is to see someone who keeps his off hand up when jabbing and generally avoids smothering his work?

What makes this such a fun matchup is their near-identical physical dimensions. Both of them are used to operating at distances where their opponents can’t retaliate, and the one who’s best able to adjust to this new environment will come out on top.

That looks, to me, like Navarrete. Foster’s only real weakness is a lack of head movement, but it’s a big one in this matchup. Navarrete has excellent timing and shot selection to catch opponents on the way in and can put on some murderous pressure when the fancy strikes. If Foster hits the ropes or tries to chase, it’ll go sideways fast.

Conversely, Foster isn’t particularly well-equipped to exploit Navarrete’s own weaknesses. For as much as Navarrete overextends, he’s generally good about only throwing truly ugly stuff when it’s hard to punish and Foster lacks the power to capitalize on those opportunities. On a similar note, Navarrete can be too content to chill in a collapsed pocket, but was still nasty enough to outgun Nunez at the latter’s preferred range. Don’t see that working overly well for Foster, either.

But let’s say Foster does force the fight he wants, a cagey fencing match. It’s more than feasible, as he’s got much better feet than Navarrete and his punches get to the target faster. That’s where the real kicker comes in: pace. Foster’s preferred output is “just enough,” which has led to truly putrid sparring matches in the past. Navarrete can throw 70 punches a round for 36 minutes, is too durable to deter, and is more adaptable than his reputation would have you believe.

It’s a hell of a needle Foster has to thread. I don’t think he can.

Navarrete vs Foster: Predictions!

Scott: Big fan of both these guys. I think the smart money is probably with Navarrete, but I’m going with O’Shaquie in a tight, controversially-scored fight. I wouldn’t advise betting that way, but I think he’ll edge this one out, I expect him to be as up for this one as he’s ever been for any fight, this is really the biggest fight of his career. What I’m most looking forward to seeing is what range dominates the fight, and who imposes their will best in that sense. O’Shaquie Foster by Split Decision

Patrick: Historically, the best way to deal with Emanuel Navarrete is to hope he didn’t train and wait for him to peter out. With his shiny new nutritionist in his corner, that avenue may be closed forever; he shrugged off some nasty body work from Nunez and was still clobbering him with abandon as the championship rounds approached.

Foster is an extremely capable fighter, unquestionably the other best man at 130. If it’s possible to defuse a dialed-in Navarrete with pure fundamentals, Foster’s the guy to do it. I just think his own shortcomings, namely the stationary head and tendency to fall into lulls, play too much into Navarrete’s strengths for me to put my faith in him. Belt number three for the cowboy. Emanuel Navarrete by Unanimous Decision

Continue Reading

Boxing

DAZN Announces Signing of Devin Haney: A Game-Changer in Boxing

Published

on

DAZN Announces Signing of Devin Haney: A Game-Changer in Boxing

It’s been talked about quite a lot lately, almost to the point it’s almost common knowledge, but today DAZN officially announced they’ve signed an exclusive multi-deal with welterweight titleholder Devin Haney. The formal announcement comes directly on the heels of a proposed fight with Shakur Stevenson falling by the wayside.

“I’m at a point in my career where I want the biggest challenges and the fights the fans want to see,” said Devin Haney. “I’m excited to partner with DAZN. This agreement removes any doubt or uncertainty about my ability to make the major fights in boxing. I’m in position to fight anyone, and I’m focused, motivated and ready for whoever is next.”

DAZN executive mentione that they expect the deal to pave the way for them to deliver marquee matchups for Haney and their network heading forward.

Haney, 27, hasn’t fought in nearly a year, last beating Brian Norman last November to take the WBO welterweight title. Hopefully this announcement will have him more active than he has been as of late.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Dalton Smith Discusses Lifetime Bans Ahead of Puello Test

Published

on

"Dalton Smith Discusses Lifetime Bans Ahead of Puello Test"

Dalton Smith is putting Alberto Puello’s failed drug test back into the conversation before Saturday’s WBC light welterweight title defense in Sheffield. If the champion loses, an explanation beyond the boxing will already be circulating.

That doesn’t prove Smith is preparing an excuse. But his comments give a difficult first defense a moral storyline before either fighter throws a punch.

Smith called for lifetime bans for fighters who fail drug tests. Puello tested positive for clomiphene in 2023 and received a six-month suspension. The article reports no new failed test ahead of Saturday’s fight.

“I think it stinks. I’m well against it myself,” Smith said to BoxingScene. “But I went in there and proved last time, sometimes you need more than just steroids. I’ll do it for the fighters in the sport that are clean.”

That last sentence turns Smith’s title defense into something bigger than defending his belt. It casts him as fighting on behalf of clean boxers, with Puello’s past providing the backdrop.

Puello’s violation is legitimate history to discuss. It also cannot explain punches, missed opportunities, or lost rounds before they happen.

Smith has a boxing problem to solve here. Puello’s southpaw movement could make him a frustrating opponent for a champion coming off his fifth-round stoppage of Subriel Matias in January.

Matias gave Smith opportunities to meet him with hard shots. Puello could make him work much harder to find those openings. If Smith follows without cutting off the ring, he risks spending rounds pursuing a challenger who refuses to give him the fight he wants.

Smith and Eddie Hearn have ambitions for a Hillsborough Stadium event. Puello could spoil those plans through positioning, timing and making the champion miss.

“If anything, they need lifetime bans, don’t they? But it’s out of my hands,” Smith said.

Saturday’s performance is in his hands. Smith can hold strong views on drug penalties while still being expected to handle an awkward mandatory challenger.

If Puello wins, his work in the ring deserves to be the first subject discussed. Smith’s comments have already supplied another one.

Introducing a moral crusade into fight week sets up an immediate psychological cushion. If Dalton goes out there and gets outboxed, frustrated, or dropped, the post-fight discourse among his local base will not be about his inability to cut off the ring or solve Puello’s southpaw stance. The talk will instantly circle back to: Well, Puello should have never been in that ring anyway because of 2023.

It gives sympathetic observers a pre-packaged storyline to diminish Puello’s ring IQ and shield Smith from the harsh reality of being tactically exposed in his own backyard.

The fantasy of a lifetime ban is quite telling. If the WBC or sanctioning bodies had handed down a permanent ban, Puello would be out of the sport entirely. That would have cleared him off Smith’s mandatory radar, allowing Matchroom to steer Smith toward an easier, straight-line brawler or an accommodating voluntary defense where the Sheffield crowd gets their highlight-reel knockout without the sweat.

Puello represents the classic “high-risk, low-reward” assignment. He does not come forward recklessly like Subriel Matias did; he refuses to stand still, he is awkward, he fights out of the southpaw stance, and he makes opponents look clumsy. When a fighter starts preaching about how their opponent technically should not exist in the division just days before the opening bell, it reveals anxiety about the stylistic nightmare waiting for them.

It is far easier to argue Puello should not be legally permitted in the ring than it is to actually pin him down and beat him for twelve rounds.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing News 24 Desk

BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending