August 4, 2025 | Opinion Turks Alalshikh promised to kill the box pay-per-view, but not watering it, and without drawing him in mediocrity before they slowly choke their lives. NO. He said it would end it for good.
So why are we now asked to publish Moses Ituma vs Dillian Whyte on Pay-Per-View?
This opinion is not digging in Ituma. Newborn bulky weight is talented and certainly has potential. But at the head of the paid event against the well -worn Whyte, who did not look the same since Povetkin’s father and whose last few fights did not get much inspired, is not a revolution promised to boxing fans.
Revolution betrayed by a paid event
If it is a PPV standard in August 2025, cancel everything now.
When Turki declared war with the established PPV model and promised to kill it in November, the fans were really excited. Finally, we had a man with power and resources to pull the plug into a system that has been tearing faithful viewers for years.
He founded mega-Cards in Riyjad with arranged excites, elite duels and there is no 30 USD+ price at the end.
It was refreshing. It was necessary. It worked.
Turks Alalshikh
Is this standard for 2025 PPV?
But now? Now we expect that he will pay for Headliner Ituma and against Whyte.
Ask yourself: if you had no relationship with any of the warriors, would you part with demanding -earned cash? If the answer is not, it does not belong to PPV. It’s elementary.
Boxing does not need another PPV model, in which promoters sell unrepeatable fights as “injuries” or “modern generation tests”. Fans are too clever now.
Turki set the belt. Let’s not leave it so quickly.
PPV’s eradication cannot take place soon if ituma vs. Whyte is the PPV standard in 2025.
About the author
Phil Jay is an experienced boxing journalist with over 15 years of experience covering the global fight scene. How The editor -in -chief of World Boxing News since 2010Jay has An interview with dozens of world champions was conducted AND Ring reported On the largest boxing nights. [View all articles by Phil Jay] And find out more about his work in combat sports journalism.
Although most people praised the timing of his decision to retire, some believe that “Bud” should have stayed with the team to prove himself against the novel generation, namely Jaron Ennis.
In a series of social media posts, Crawford appeared to refer to an interview with “Boots” Ennis in which the 28-year-old claimed that if the fight did happen, he would be confident of winning by knockout.
Crawford added that he “waived or rejected” the challenge. While he suggested it wasn’t directed at Ennis, he quickly added that the rising star’s career “would be over” if he fought.
“How did you get Boots out of what I just said? It’s crazy how you all play like you like him but want me [to] end your career before it starts, because that would definitely happen.
lol how did you get Boots out of what I just said?🤣🤣🤣 it’s crazy how you all play the way you like him but you wanted me to end his career before it started because that would definitely have happened.🤣🤣 smh, let me tell you something else.
“Boots” won the IBF interim welterweight title around the same time that Crawford was becoming the undisputed leader of the division by defeating Errol Spence. He was later promoted to full champion when “Bud” increased in weight.
With fighting no longer an option, Ennis is now focused on creating his own legacy in the sport. In June, he has a chance to become a unified two-division world champion when he faces Xander Zayas for the Puerto Rican’s WBO and WBA super welterweight belts. This is a fight that “Bud” is supporting “Boots” to win.
“What’s better than being Undisputed? Being Undisputed twice. What’s better than being Undisputed twice? Being Undisputed 3 times at three different weights. Now argue with your mom.”
Crawford clearly sees it differently. His argument is straightforward. Becoming unchallenged once is infrequent. Doing this twice puts the athlete in unique company. Doing this three times in three divisions gives him a resume that doesn’t require much defense.
That was Crawford’s response to anyone who questioned the timing of his departure.
Some fans believe Crawford left at the perfect time, before Ennis became more in demand and before top super middleweights started calling for him. Ennis is just a part of it. Crawford’s retirement removed him from the ranks of contenders who would force these fights next.
While Crawford points to his three sets of belts as proof of greatness, a vocal segment of the boxing world sees these titles as shields rather than trophies.
The argument is that being unchallenged today is as much about promotional maneuvers and sanctioning body politics as it is about being the best. To these fans, Crawford’s departure looks like a calculated retreat. By leaving now, he avoids the hungry Jaron “Boots” Ennis and the group of talented 168 fighters that Alvarez ignored for years.
Crawford was allowed to fight for Canelo’s undisputed championship at 168 without facing any of the 168-year-old fighters: Osleys Iglesias, Christian Mbilli, Lester Martinez, Diego Pacheco and Hamzah Sheeraz.
Much of fan frustration stems from “skip the queue” culture. Fans say superstars can compete in title fights without facing established challengers who competed in mandatory positions. When Crawford defeated Canelo, he took the throne, but he didn’t necessarily clear the room.
Tomek Galm is a boxing journalist covering the global fight landscape since 2014, specializing in heavyweight analysis, industry trends and fighter psychology.
Muhammad Ali is considered by many to be the greatest heavyweight of all time and arguably the greatest fighter of all time, but in the eyes of another pound-for-pound legend, Floyd Mayweather, there is another recent heavyweight who would defeat “The Greatest.”
Ali suffered five defeats in his iconic career, with three of them coming in his last four contests when his best form was well behind him; losing to Leon Spinks, Larry Holmes and then Trevor Berbick.
His other two shortcomings came at the hands of Joe Frazier and Ken Norton, both of whom he avenged twice in his trilogies, which is one of the many reasons why Ali is considered the best heavyweight operator in history.
In addition to Ali, the other standout candidate for the title is Joe Louis, who holds the record for the longest reign in the history of the division – holding the heavyweight title for almost 12 years and making 25 consecutive title defenses.
However, Mayweather said that by participating in the premier “Winner Stays On” match, which features the best heavyweights of all time, Daily mail box that he believes first-rate Lennox Lewis would beat Ali.
Like Ali before his last two fights, Lewis has defeated every opponent in his career, winning rematches against Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman, who shockingly knocked him out to become one of five three-time heavyweight champions.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.