Liverpool, Great Britain -after almost a year of industry research and preparation behind the scenes, Global Fighters’ Association (GFA) Today he announced the first in a 12-month program of round tables in the nationwide “selection committee”, marking the formal movement of the organization to the public domain as a representative body for fighters, employees and fans in combat sport.

Designed in cooperation with older political and sports strategies, these expert forums will gather votes from the entire industry to examine some of the most urgent and long problems in sport-assessment and functioning, to prosperity, security, integration, education and responsibility.

The first round table that takes place PowerHe will focus on one of the most smoking fears in sport: Refereeing professional duels. After widespread social fear and athlete related to transparency and consistency of scoring, GFA will order a full independent review in order to examine how decisions are made to assess how they are examined and how the standards can be improved.

Round tables will be conducted and reported by independent lawyers With experience in the well -being of athletes, management and sports regulations. Participants will cover There were fighters at all levels and disciplines, judges, judges, trainers, promoters, broadcasters, gym owners, doctors, financial and legal experts.

Co -founder of GFA Paul Smith Jr. he said: “It’s about opening the door to a real dialogue. Fighters were too often ignored when sporting is being conducted. These round tables are a chance to gather the right people with the right experience, asking the most arduous, most critical questions. We believe that these reports will aid provide greater protection for fighters, greater transparency for fans and aid you achieve sport.”

The sender and co -founder of GFA Nick Peet added: “Boxing and combat sport have huge global potential – but the foundations must be right. It is not about pointing to the fingers; it is about creating a place for the right reform, rooted in experience and expert knowledge.”

While GFA will publish the arrangements and recommendations from each round table, No results or rules are predetermined.

Topics for discussions on the inaugural round tables will include:

• Transparency and consistency in professional scoring
• Qualifications, responsibility and training for judges
• Standards of review procedures after combat
• Potential models of structured reviews of scoring

GFA round tables are First in a series of public activities The organization will undertake before formal launch this year.