California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) turned over the super feather champion WBO Emanuel Navarrete Technical Technical Decision with Charly Suarez from 10 May, changing it to a unique lack, June 2, 2025.
Explained the unexpected ruling
The CSAC decision does not give Suarez a victory that some consider to be deserving. Everything he does is leave the fight, as if it never happened. Navarrete promoter, the highest rank arum, plans to set a rematch. However, Suarez (18-0, 10 KO) will enter him as a claimant than a master. This means less money.
In the fight of Navarrete-Susarez on May 10 at the Lucky Arena in San Diego, California Navarrete (39-2-1, 32 KO) suffered a deep cut on the left eye in the sixth round, which was said by the judge, Edward Collantes, was caused by the collision of the head. The repetitions showed that this was caused by a left hook from Suarez.
The fight was later detained in one second to the eighth round to the Ring Council of Robert Robert Ruelaz because Navarrete has problems with his left eye because of blood from the cut. 30-year-old Navarrete received a technical decision from the eighth round in results 77-76, 78-75 and 77-76.
Fans call robbery
Many boxing fans thought that Suarez had done enough to win the fight, and they thought it was a robbery. The repetition judge and clerk, Jack Reiss, do not issue a correct decision on the cause of the cut, but the scoring of three judges did not make sense.
The result of today’s insignificant CSAC decision means that the Suarez record is now once again 18-0. Navarrete is still the WBO Super Feather Wweight champion. He did not receive a losing to the eighth round, which according to some fans should.
Navarrete is still master
Although Navarrete’s victory has been picked up, he is still a champion and gets to do. Suarez has a second chance. There are reports that a rematch can be issued in the Saarez’s hometown in the Philippines.
Navarrete must cut himself because he looked like a flabby, snail-paced and tired during the fight. He was at its best in the first three rounds, but he blurred on the fourth. He was overtaken and passed by more physically effective and athletic Suarez.
Errol Spence Jr gained additional motivation to defeat Tim Tszyu, knowing that the winner of the upcoming fight could face a potentially more lucrative opportunity.
The two former world champions will face each other on July 25 in Australia, with Tszyu having the home advantage and looking to rejoin the world stage.
To do this, the 31-year-old must defeat a credible opponent and prove that despite losing three of his last six fights, he remains one of the top super welterweight fighters in the world.
Ideally, he would have fought Spence at 154 pounds, but given his opponent’s three-year layoff, Tszyu ultimately agreed to fight at the catchweight of 158 pounds.
Before the long break, Spence lost the WBC, IBF and WBA welterweight titles to Terence Crawford, who defeated his rival with a surprisingly one-sided ninth-round stoppage.
However, even before his loss to “Bud,” many believed that “The Truth” would be better suited to the 154-pound division, where he plans to make his mark after his triumph over Tszyu.
If such a plan comes to fruition, Spence could enter into a national feud with Jermell Charlo, who has not fought since unanimous decision loss to Canelo Alvarez in September 2023
According to Mike Coppinger of Ring MagazineCharlo could very well face Tszyu if the Australian wins the fight against Spence.
“I was told he would be lined up to win [Spence-Tszyu]. Of course, nothing has been done yet. I’m told that behind the scenes, Charlo is being lined up for this fight, which will take place at 154 pounds.[lbs]”
Before the 168-pound fight with Canelo, Charlo became the undisputed super welterweight champion by dethroning Brian Castano by a 10th-round stoppage in 2022, less than a year after his controversial boxing draw.
The 36-year-old achieved this ambition by training under Derrick James, who is also Spence’s former head coach.
“If Turki calls me and says, ‘Listen, we have an opportunity here to do this. What do you think?’ I said, ‘Look, I’d rather do it in the UK, but let me talk to Anthony.’ We’ll look at the numbers and go from there,” Hearn told Fight Hub TV. “I wouldn’t rule out this fight taking place anywhere, but I think it’s more than likely you’ll see it in the UK.”
These comments may prove crucial due to the scale of the event.
Unlike recent blockbuster fights that have largely revolved around a single marquee attraction, Joshua vs. Fury features two internationally recognized heavyweight stars. Both fighters headlined stadium events, attracted significant pay-per-view audiences and built a fan base that reached far beyond the UK.
This reality may ultimately influence the event venue discussion.
From a British perspective, Wembley Stadium would seem a natural venue for the fight. The atmosphere created by two domestic heavyweight rivals could make this one of the biggest sporting events in recent British history.
However, Saudi Arabia’s investment in boxing is rarely driven solely by ticket sales revenues. The Kingdom is increasingly using major sporting events to promote tourism and showcase itself to international audiences as part of its broader Vision 2030 strategy.
If Turki Alalshikh is bankrolling what could become the biggest fight in British boxing history, there is a business case for staging it in Riyad rather than allowing another country to benefit from the influx of visitors and world attention.
Hearn maintains that the UK remains the preferred destination. However, his confirmation that discussions could resume if Turki offers an alternative suggests the setting may not be as placid as many fans assumed.
The World Boxing Organization has responded to Floyd Schofield’s deleted claims, with president Gustavo Olivieri urging the lightweight fighter to hand over any evidence he has to law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
Schofield, who remains the mandatory challenger to Gervonta Davis under a separate WBA order, appeared to make the allegations on social media before deleting the post.
What exactly Schofield said remains unclear.
The concern faded away before many had a chance to see it, but Olivieri’s response left no doubt as to the seriousness of the concerns raised.
“Hey, Master!” Olivieri began.
“If you have credible evidence, documentation, witness statements, or other credible information that suggests corruption, bribery, fraud, abuse of power, or any other unlawful conduct involving a WBO official, I encourage you to submit such information to the appropriate law enforcement authorities, including the FBI or other appropriate agencies, so that it may be appropriately reviewed and investigated.”
Olivieri also advised Schofield to seek legal advice if he believed he had been wrongly denied opportunities.
“If you believe that another sanctioning authority has wrongly denied you an opportunity, you may wish to consult a lawyer experienced in boxing to assess your situation and advise you of any rights and remedies that may be available to you.”
Second time
The exchange marks the second time in recent months that Olivieri has publicly urged someone in the boxing world to contact the FBI if there is evidence to support allegations involving the sport’s governing body.
This also reflects a trend that is becoming more and more common in the world of boxing social media.
Rather than private discussions, formal complaints, or legal channels, complaints are often brought to the public before being later clarified – if they are clarified at all.
The moment is noteworthy as Schofield remains at the center of the ongoing WBA situation involving Davis. With the deadline still looming and Davis lacking a viable return option, the undefeated contender has repeatedly applied pressure via social media.
Schofield quickly backed down, although the reaction his words provoked soon overshadowed the complaint itself.
Floyd Schofield
Public forum
Posts like Schofield’s are becoming common, and sanctioning authorities are increasingly responding to criticism, accusations and frustration in public places.
Every ranking, exemption, must-see and championship ruling is now analyzed in minutes.
Even under Olivieri’s post, users immediately questioned several recent WBO decisions, including allowing Janibek Alimkhanuly to retain his title despite his long absence and installing Keyshawn Davis as the mandatory challenger to Shakur Stevenson, even though Davis has never fought for the 147-pound title or fought for the 140-weight title.
It may never be known whether Schofield’s fears were justified.
But when boxers go public with their concerns along with fans, the job of sanctioning authorities becomes much more arduous.
About the author
Phil Jay is the editor-in-chief of World Boxing News (WBN) and a boxing veteran with over 15 years of experience. Read the full biography.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.