Connect with us

Boxing

Mike Tyson’s youngest heavyweight record – Patterson vs. Itauma debate heats up

Published

on

Mike Tyson Moses Itauma Floyd Patterson

Rising British heavyweight Moses Itauma may challenge Kubrat Pulev for the WBA Regular title in December 2025, with the goal of breaking Mike Tyson’s youngest heavyweight record and sparking debate about Floyd Patterson’s legacy.

The WBA has ordered Kubrat Pulev to defend his secondary crown against Itauma, opening the door to a potentially significant achievement for the rising British star – if negotiations are successful.

In the fight, which is likely to take place on December 13, 2025 in Manchester, Itauma will headline Derek Chisora’s farewell card if promoter Frank Warren manages to strike a deal with Pulev and Epic Sports.

However, even if Itauma secures the WBA Regular heavyweight belt two weeks before his 21st birthday, the feat could be controversial. Pulev is a minor champion, a title many fans and media consider diluted due to the WBA’s long-standing practice of recognizing multiple champions in one division.

History suggests that debate over whether Itauma’s achievement lives up to the validity of former heavyweight legends is inevitable.

Don King vs. Epic Sports: Pulev vs. Hunter Fallout

Promotor Don King nalegał, aby jego wcześniej ogłoszona walka pomiędzy Kubratem Pulewem a Michaelem Hunterem, która odbędzie się 4 października w Casino Miami, będzie kontynuowana. King vowed to take legal action against any party trying to block the fight, even though Hunter claimed he was in free agent status and was considering a match with Jarrell Miller during Canelo vs. Crawford fight week.

“They’re trying to destroy Michael Hunter’s career,” King said. “Epic Sports continues to spread lies and false statements. This fight will continue!”

Meanwhile, Pulev’s team at Epic Sports questioned the feasibility of the fight, highlighting growing promoter conflicts in heavyweight boxing. Epic Sports stwierdziło:

“Following the recent confirmation of Hunter’s fight against Jarrell Miller and the ongoing legal dispute with Don King Productions, the WBA has withdrawn the award. Pulev is no longer obligated to fight Hunter and is cleared to make his first title defense against any WBA-ranked challenger voluntarily.

King maintains his legendary reputation for fighting for the rights of his players, insisting the fight is not over yet, even though Pulev’s team has signaled it may take a different path.

The legal battle may still impact whether Moses Itauma gets crack, but even if he does, it will open another can of worms.

Itauma, who began his professional career in 2023, initially wanted to break Mike Tyson’s record as the youngest heavyweight champion, but ran out of time. Jednak w sytuacji, gdy Pulew posiadał drugi tytuł WBA, każde kolejne zwycięstwo po nieudanej próbie bicia rekordu wywołałoby debatę na temat tego, czy osiągnięcie to zasługuje na historyczne porównanie.

If Itauma wins the WBA Regular title, he will be younger than Floyd Patterson, who won the NBA/NYSAC crown at the age of 21 years, 10 months and 26 days. Critics will argue that Pulev’s title shot lacks the prestige of the Tyson or Patterson era.

To nie jest wina Itaumy; that’s what happens when second-rate titles muddy the waters.

The WBA Regular heavyweight title has a checkered and controversial history. Since its inception in 2011, it has caused a stir among fans and boxers alike.

2011: Alexander Povetkin vs. Ruslan Chagaev punished for inaugural Regular title

2013: WBA allowed Wladimir Klitschko to unify the belts while keeping the regular title holders in the game

The following years: interim titles, legal disputes and multiple champions weakened the championship

WBN consistently reports on the tumultuous approach of the WBA. WBA zniosła tytuły tymczasowe dopiero po ujawnieniu zarzutów o stronnicze sędziowanie, jednak tytuły drugorzędne i regularne nadal się utrzymują, myląc porównania historyczne i postrzeganie fanów.

[edited by WBN]

For comparison, here is a list of the youngest heavyweight champions.

1 | | WBC | 22 listopada 1986 | 20 lat, 4 miesiące, 23 dni
2 | Mojżesz Itauma | WBA Regular | 13 grudnia 2025 | 20 lat, 11 miesięcy, 17 dni
2 | | NBA, Fresh York | 30 listopada 1956 | 21 lat, 10 miesięcy, 26 dni
3 | | WBA, WBC | 25 lutego 1964 | 22 years, 8 days
4 | | NBA, Nowy Jork | 22 czerwca 1937 | 23 lata, 1 miesiąc, 9 dni
5 | | Liniowy | 4 lipca 1919 | 24 lata, 0 miesięcy, 10 dni
| WBA, WBC | 22 lutego 1973 | 24 lata, 0 miesięcy, 12 dni
| NYSAC | 4 marca 1968 | 24 lata, 1 miesiąc, 21 dni
8 | | Linear | 9 czerwca 1899 | 24 lata, 1 miesiąc, 25 dni
| WBA | December 10, 1982 | 24 lata i 4 miesiące
10 | | WBO | 14 października 2000 | 24 lata, 6 miesięcy, 19 dni

Gold champion: Michael Hunter

Mark Robinson

The debate over Itauma’s record is about more than statistics – it’s about credibility. Can a minor title legally rewrite history? WBN twierdzi, że odpowiedź nie jest prosta.

About the author

Phil Jay is with over obejmujące globalną scenę walki. How Since 2010, editor-in-chief of World Boxing News (WBN).Jay has interviewed dozens of world champions and the most crucial boxing evenings in the ring were reported.

[View all articles by Phil Jay]

WBN Bulletin for trusted updates, exclusive interviews and fight analysis delivered daily.

Join [World Boxing News Channel] or follow WBN further [Linktree].

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boxing

Rico Verhoeven doesn’t need a rematch – he needed one more second

Published

on

Referee Mark Lyson stops Oleksandr Usyk vs Rico Verhoeven late in the eleventh round in Egypt

Rico Verhoeven doesn’t need a rematch with Oleksandr Usyk because boxing has already taken away from him what he really deserved in Egypt.

Not heavyweight titles. Not a victory. Not even official recognition on the scorecards.

Verhoeven earned the right to hear the bell ring at the Pyramids after pushing the unified heavyweight champion much harder than almost anyone expected.

That moment was taken from him with a second left.

Usyk clearly didn’t prepare to the best of his ability and looked musclebound as he struggled through long stretches of the competition. However, turning him on for the last few rounds and hoping he had enough left in the tank to stop the tiring Verhoeven was certainly not part of the game plan.

The Ukrainian looked genuinely shocked at how Verhoeven was able to maneuver around the ring in such an unconventional way that he repeatedly prevented Usyk from gaining any rhythm.

As detailed in WBN’s live coverage from Giza, Verhoeven frustrated Usyk from the first round and never allowed the champion to fully take control.

Even when Usyk finally succeeded in the underbelly and started hurting Verhoeven towards the end, the Dutchman still survived, recovered and made the fight awkward enough to keep the fight hanging in the balance.

Verhoeven was seriously injured at the end of the eleventh set, but giving him that one minute to recover was the least he could pay for his fortitude and determination.

Mark Lyson’s decision

Therefore, referee Mark Lyson’s decision will remain a long-debated topic of the event.

Lyson is usually one of the better referees in boxing and is rarely controversial. This time, however, he must seriously consider the decision to stop the fight.

The official time of the eleventh round is 2:59. In fact, I thought it was at least 3:01 because the bell had already rung before Lyson had fully entered the action.

Verhoeven got back to his feet. He was prepared to continue and was a second away from hearing the bell ending the final round.

He fully deserved this opportunity.

Mark Robinson

Instead, the ending immediately reopened familiar accusations that boxing protects its own when outside forces threaten the established order.

As detailed in WBN’s post-fight report, the controversy only intensified as Verhoeven appeared to be ahead on multiple unofficial cards entering the championship rounds.

WBN had Rico Verhoeven leading 97-93 after ten rounds and 105-103 after eleven, even including the knockdown.

However, both the live WBC scorecards read in the arena and the WBA scorecards revealed after the fight in which Verhoeven did not win.

That says a lot.

There is no need for a rematch with Usyk

As for the rematch, there’s really no point.

Usyk would almost certainly have prepared better for the second fight and would likely have stopped Verhoeven in the first half of the fight once he was fully accustomed to the movement and rhythm that surprised him in Egypt.

That intrigue is now over and Usyk has his mandatory duties behind him.

Boxing had a chance to adapt to another combat sports star who went far beyond his comfort zone and exceeded almost all expectations placed on him.

Instead, the sport turned what should have been a remarkable crossover success into another evening dominated by controversy, debates over results and accusations of protectionism surrounding one of boxing’s biggest stars.

Verhoeven may never officially receive the recognition many believe he deserves. But he also doesn’t need a rematch to confirm what happened.

For ten rounds under the pyramids, Rico Verhoeven proved that he was there. This should be enough.


About the author

Phil Jay is the editor-in-chief of World Boxing News (WBN) and a boxing veteran with over 15 years of experience. Read the full biography.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Rico Verhoeven threatens to appeal following controversy over Oleksandr Usyk’s detention

Published

on

Image: Rico Verhoeven Threatens Appeal After Oleksandr Usyk Stoppage Controversy

“I just saw the ending because of all the comments I was reading, and they stopped the fight after the bell,” Verhoeven told Boxing News.

“So the bell rang and then they stopped the fight. So yeah, I guess we can just go and file an appeal because it doesn’t make any sense, right? If the bell rang and then they stopped the fight, then why, you know, then it’s my time to rest.”

Verhoeven later explained why he believed the fight should have continued, saying he was aware of what happened after the knockdown and believed he was defending himself properly.

“I did the math. It was a good math. Yes, it was necessary. But I felt like I heard a click. So I thought, ‘OK, let’s go.’ We have about 10 seconds,” Verhoeven said.

“So let’s keep moving. Hands up and catching the shots. I feel like that’s what I was doing. So right away when the ref came in, I wasn’t stunned or anything. I was looking at the ref like, ‘Why are you stopping? We’re almost there.’

Verhoeven also mentioned the possibility of the fight being declared a no-contest or having it recorded on the scorecards rather than ending in a defeat at half-time.

“Looking back, even the bell rang. He should have been aware of that. Of course, mistakes can happen, but looking back, the referee should have admitted his mistake and said, ‘Hey, so either there’s no contest or we’ll go to the scorecards,'” Rico said.

“And I think if we go to the scorecards, I had the advantage.”

Despite the controversial ending, Verhoeven said the performance convinced him to pursue a boxing career after pushing Usyk harder than many expected.

“He had both hands occupied. He is the undisputed champion and until tonight I had never seen any boxer do that to him,” Verhoeven said.

“I found my up-to-date passion in combat sports. I hope I surprised and shocked the boxing world because I’m here to stay.”

A successful appeal could cause an undesirable delay for Usyk, who has already been linked to several huge heavyweight fights. Verhoeven’s performance and reaction after the break could also give the rematch more commercial value than many expected before Saturday night.

Youtube video

Continue Reading

Boxing

Top trainer Abel Sanchez confidently predicts Fury vs Joshua: ‘I always picked him’

Published

on

Top trainer Abel Sanchez makes confident Fury vs Joshua prediction: “I’ve always picked him”

Top trainer Abel Sanchez has revealed his predictions for the highly anticipated heavyweight clash between Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua.

The pair are expected to clash later this year, probably in October or November, with ‘AJ’ first having to take care of Kristian Prenga on July 25.

This is his first appearance since scoring the goal sixth round finish to Jake Paul in December which followed his fifth-round loss to Daniel Dubois in September 2024.

It’s also been less than five months since Joshua was involved in a tragic car accident, leaving him mourning the loss of close friends.

Meanwhile, Fury is coming off a unanimous decision victory over Arslanbek Makhmudov last month, when he ended a 16-month sideline following a back-to-back defeat to Oleksandr Usyk in 2024.

However, despite his return to action, the 37-year-old is currently pushing for a second warm-up fight in August, with the likes of Jarrell Miller and Andy Ruiz Jr. among potential opponents.

In any case, former trainer Gennady Golovkin Sanchez always supported Fury in beating Joshua, saying: Professional boxing fans that he sees no reason to change his mind.

“Tyson already has a fight under his belt. Anthony has had some tough personal issues recently, so that could be a factor in how he looks [approaches] fight.

“I hope he’s OK and it will be a great fight. I still pick Tyson to win – I’ve always picked Tyson to win against Joshua. Fury is one of those fighters who sides with his opponent.”

Although Joshua and Fury have signed a contract to fight later this year, the news of a second warm-up fight for “The Gypsy King” only added a layer of uncertainty to the equation.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending