Boxing
Where did the wild spark go?
Published
9 hours agoon
“I can only take what’s coming my way,” Norman told Ring magazine when asked about the bigger names being discussed in the division. “I’m pretty sure these guys will still be here when that time comes.”
Norman concluded his response by stating that he would address matters on May 16 and then accept whatever was proposed after that date.
“Whatever is put on the table next, I’ll take it. I don’t care who it is.”
That loss to Devin Haney in November stripped him of his WBO title and appears to have stripped away some of his fighting spirit as well. This is a complete 180 from the “Savage” personality he brought to Saudi Arabia.
When Malik Scott insisted on naming names, his broken spirit was likely a lingering effect of the reality check Haney handed him.
Getting dropped in the second round and then being chased around the ring for 12 rounds by a guy most people thought was damaged after the Ryan Garcia fight has to be a huge psychological blow.
The May 16 fight with Josh Wagner is textbook matchmaking for a fighter whose confidence is in the basement. Wagner is a solid enough professional, but he’s not in the same stratosphere as the names Norman previously dismissed.
Norman is a huge 1/20 favorite. This fight is about a knockout so he can remember what victory feels like.
It’s irritating to hear a teenage player who was once so vocal suddenly seem content to just “take whatever’s on the table.” In boxing, this is usually code for “I’m not sure I belong at the top yet.”
If he fights Wagner at all in Norfolk, or even if he wins but looks unsure, this assertive and confident version of Brian Norman Jr. may disappear for good.
May 16 will be less about Josh Wagner and more about Norman proving to himself and his coach that the Haney loss hasn’t permanently damaged him.
The version of Norman Jr. we saw in Riyad was unrecognizable from the guy who annihilated Giovani Santillan. When Haney dropped him in the second, it seemed like the “Savage” personality immediately evaporated and was replaced by a warrior who was in survival mode.
Watching the octopus separate from Haney was definitely frustrating, but the real problem: Norman Jr. he didn’t have the dog in him tonight to fight it. Instead of using his strength to push Haney away or work his body during the hold, he simply stood there and allowed Haney to neutralize his attacks over and over again.
This defeated energy is precisely why Wagner’s fight on May 16 is so blatantly planned. If Norman Jr. he was afraid to push a guy like Haney, who isn’t exactly known as a devastating one-punch KO artist, which is a huge red flag when he finally faces a real puncher like Ennis or even a heavy-handed Benn.
In boxing, when a fighter’s invincibility is destroyed and he shows his timidity, it is rarely a one-off event. It usually becomes a novel plan for each opponent.
The fight in Norfolk is clearly a test for his team to see if they can find the missing aggression in a low-risk environment. Wagner has ten knockouts, but he won’t demand respect like a top-flight elite would.
If Norman Jr. comes out on May 16 and is still uncertain, waiting for Wagner to lead or fail to initiate exchanges, then we will know for sure that the fight with Haney cost him not only the belt, but also his fighting identity.
It’s one thing to lose a decision, but it’s another thing entirely to lose an edge and start sounding like you’re just ecstatic to be there.
Dan Ambrose is a boxing journalist at Boxing News 24, respected for his direct analysis and extensive coverage of the global fight landscape. His reports focus on the most vital fights, division development and the most discussed stories in sports.
You may like
While talking about failed drug tests in boxing, host Simon Jordan cited an earlier estimate by panelist Spencer Oliver, who suggested the number could be as high as 70 percent. Hamed immediately disputed this statement.
“That’s a tough statement,” Hamed told talksport Boxing when the number was repeated during the episode.
“The same applies to me personally. Don’t take it personally. It’s like destroying the players, 70% of them,” Hamed said.
It was vintage “Naz” stuff, seeing him come out waving to players like that. He has always been devoted to the craft and clearly sees the 70% result as a slap in the face to the guys who live neat and do grueling work.
Oliver responded that this was his opinion based on repeated failed tests and suspicions surrounding the sport, not evidence against specific names. Hamed was not convinced and said that charges should only be brought when the militant was actually caught.
“You can’t accuse any single person unless he or she has been caught,” Hamed said.
Hamed’s point about “destroying” warriors is the most compelling part of his argument. When someone like Spencer Oliver comes up with a huge number, like 70%, it creates a lasting cloud of suspicion.
This means that even if a player delivers a legendary, career-defining performance, the first thing some fans will do is look for a reason to discredit him. For a legend like Hamed, this is an insult to the discipline required in this sport.
Hamed is the guy who shows me the bills. By insisting that no one can be charged until they are caught, he seeks to maintain some level of due process. In his eyes, if you have failed the VADA or UKAD exam, you are a pure athlete. Period.
What’s captivating is that Hamed doesn’t take it lightly. While supporting strict accountability policies, he says people should not be labeled as fraudsters without evidence. If the test comes back positive, you own it, regardless of tainted meat or supplement excuses.
This is an truthful position. He wants to protect the reputation of good actors in sports while making sure the hammer continues to fall on anyone caught breaking the rules.
Olly Campbell is a boxing journalist covering this sport since 2014, providing reports from the ring and technical analyzes of the most essential fights. His work focuses on fighter tendencies, tactical adjustments and the details that shape high-level competition.
Boxing
Nick Khan presents Zuffa alternative at Ali Act hearing
Published
3 hours agoon
April 23, 2026
Nick Khan presented an alternative to Zuffa Boxing at the Muhammad Ali Bill hearing, outlining a clear plan to attract fighters through centralized commercial opportunities.
Khan spoke during ongoing discussions on potential reform of the Ali Law, explaining how Zuffa intends to operate in sports by offering a unified platform linked to broadcasting, sponsorship and revenue sharing.
The proposal states that Zuffa provides a direct alternative to the current boxing system used by sanctioning authorities, with a greater emphasis on long-term contracts and broader exposure.
Outline of the Zuffa model
Khan said fighters who join the organization will benefit from a broad platform, citing a distribution deal with Paramount and access to its global subscriber base, as well as network support from CBS.
“If you want a chance to be something bigger in less time on the platform, we were able to sign a deal with Paramount, as I said, for a platform that has almost 80 million subscribers worldwide and has a network partner in CBS,” Khan said during the hearing.
“If you want that exposure, if you want deals on trading cards, if you want deals on merchandise, if you want deals on video games where all the competitors will participate financially. If you want all of that and more, come this way. If not, that’s your choice.”
Khan also provided a critical perspective on the current state of the sport, stating that existing sanctioning body structures have negatively impacted the development of boxing.
“They are terrible for the sport. They have ruined the sport.”
An alternative approach
Khan’s comments were among the most detailed during the hearing, as Zuffa’s plan was presented as an option that could complement the existing system, rather than replace it entirely, in the wake of recent events that have already seen fighters walk away from world titles as tensions with sanctioning authorities rise.
However, his comments about sanctioning bodies also raised questions about how such an approach would be taken in the current setup, especially after the IBF clarified Richardson Hitchins’ title position following his move to Zuffa Boxing.
The discussion comes as renewed attention is drawn to the Ali Law, with lawmakers considering whether the changes could alter the balance between fighters, promoters and governing bodies.
A fighter perspective
The financial model outlined by Khan reflects militants’ concerns about how revenues should be distributed.
Sean O’Malley has previously made similar points, stating in Food Truck Diaries, “Reebok made over a million dollars on all my merchandise, and I got like $3,000.”
Nico Ali Walsh, Muhammad Ali’s grandson and an vigorous fighter, also said at the hearing that his grandfather’s name should be removed from the bill if it passes the Senate.
About the author
Phil Jay is the editor-in-chief of World Boxing News (WBN) and a boxing veteran with over 15 years of experience. Read the full biography.
Boxing
Oleksandr Usyk has a retirement date set: “It’s almost here”
Published
3 hours agoon
April 23, 2026
Next month, Oleksandr Usyk begins a three-fight plan before his potential retirement in 2027, and the heavyweight ruler has now provided an update on the final months of his career.
In recent years, Usyk has established himself as a boxing legend, building on his phenomenal, undisputed performance at cruiserweight and repeating the feat at heavyweight, becoming the second fighter to capture the undisputed crown in both divisions.
The 39-year-old Usyk is starting to lose strength, as his next opponent boasts a boxing record of just 1-0 and Rico Verhoeven is more of a kickboxing superstar than a recognized threat to the heavyweight throne.
After Verhoeven, the Ukrainian is targeting the winner of Fabio Wardley vs. Daniel Dubois, although he said he would also consider mandatory challenger Agit Kabayel. Previously, his desired next move was a trilogy fight with Tyson Fury, but with ‘The Gypsy King’ set to face Anthony Joshua, Usyk may take a step back and choose a different opponent for his farewell fight.
No matter who is on the opposite side, said the unified champion Daily mail box has already set a date for hanging up the gloves and that it is already “close”.
“Of course [I am savouring each moment of my career before retirement]. Three days ago I thought to myself, “this is a date.” [I have been thinking about] as I say [that I am retired and] what I’m saying. Listen, it’s almost here.
The unconventional Usyk-Verhoeven fight takes place in an equally unconventional venue, with the two great men in the foreground beneath the Pyramids of Giza in Egypt, capping off a bill that includes a fight that could determine Usyk’s other future opponent.
David Benavidez is considering two names after Zurdo Ramirez
Prince Naseem Hamed denies 70% doping claims
Conor Benn vs. Regis Prograis • FULL FINAL PRESS CONFERENCE | Netflix Boxing
Trending
-
Opinions & Features1 year agoPacquiao vs marquez competition: History of violence
-
MMA1 year agoDmitry Menshikov statement in the February fight
-
Results1 year agoStephen Fulton Jr. becomes world champion in two weight by means of a decision
-
Results1 year agoKeyshawn Davis Ko’s Berinchyk, when Xander Zayas moves to 21-0
-
Video1 year agoFrank Warren on Derek Chisora vs Otto Wallin – ‘I THOUGHT OTTO WOULD GIVE DEREK PROBLEMS!’
-
Analysis1 year agoRobert Garcia discusses the debate on the greatest Mexican warrior in history
-
Video1 year ago‘DEREK CHISORA RETIRE TONIGHT!’ – Anthony Yarde PLEADS for retirement after WALLIN
-
Results1 year agoLive: Catterall vs Barboza results and results card



