Connect with us

Boxing

Mike Tyson vs. Buster Douglas rematch debate resumed after WBC reaction

Published

on

Tyson vs Douglas 2

Thirty-six years after one of heavyweight boxing’s most contentious nights, the debate over Mike Tyson’s first defeat resurfaced when WBC president Mauricio Sulaimán was asked why an immediate rematch with James “Buster” Douglas was not ordered in 1990.

The fan question alluded to the controversial eighth-round knockdown in Tokyo and suggested that the WBC could knock Douglas out of shape if he refused to fight Tyson again.

Sulaimán replied: “It was about 36 years ago. I remember Holyfield was the mandatory challenger and then he fought Douglas. I’m sorry I don’t have the details right now, but I’ll look into it.”

One low response reopened a familiar argument and, more importantly, shifted the focus back to what the WBC could realistically do once the result was official.

Long count vs. knockdown debate

Tyson dropped Douglas slow in the eighth round of an undisputed title fight in February 1990 at the Tokyo Dome. The number given by referee Octavio Meyran has been debated for decades, and footage shows Douglas lying on the ground for more than 10 seconds before the bell ended the round.

The referee’s count is discretionary, although traditionally he follows the ten-second standard.

World Boxing News has previously analyzed this incident and its fallout in our coverage of the eighth-round controversy and Meyran’s subsequent explanation in his referee’s statement.

As for the rematch question, the main issue isn’t whether fans think the count was leisurely. The issue is whether the WBC was justified in stepping in and changing the next move after the fight was signed.

Why Holyfield was next

At the time, Evander Holyfield was the mandatory challenger for the WBC title. When Douglas stopped Tyson in the tenth round, the WBC regulations directly indicated a mandatory defense.

Douglas then fought Holyfield and lost the title later in 1990, which matches Sulaimán’s recollection of this sequence.

Any rematch clause would be a contractual matter between the fighters and the promoters. The WBC’s job is to maintain order in the championship, and mandates are rarely bypassed without a formal revocation or official ruling changing the outcome of the fight.

A Don King production

Could the WBC have ordered a rematch?

In scarce cases, sanctioning authorities may take action after stern controversy. However, such situations usually require a formal protest process and a clear violation that warrants intervention.

Without a successful appeal or official change of result, Douglas remained champion on paper. In such a scenario, getting rid of him for Tyson’s fight with another contender for the vacant belt would involve the risk of legal consequences and undermining the WBC ranking structure.

Sulaimán’s response suggests that the WBC viewed Holyfield’s mandatory status as a controlling factor at the time and hinted that it would look into the finer details behind the scenes.

Some have long argued that the WBC could have delayed Holyfield’s mandatory commitment and ordered a rematch, although that would have required bending its own championship structure.

Why is this question still being asked

The Tyson-Douglas rematch debate endures because it combines two things that boxing fans rarely accept quietly: contentious judging and a title structure that moves on without looking back.

Sulaimán’s answer does not rewrite history. This highlights the likely reason why the WBC did not force an immediate rematch with Tyson.

As history shows, Holyfield was next in line and, without a formal repeal of the Tokyo decision, the mandatory route remained unchanged.

More than three decades later, the Tokyo count – and the rematch that never materialized – remains one of heavyweight boxing’s most enduring, unresolved debates.


About the author

Phil Jay is the editor-in-chief of World Boxing News (WBN) and a boxing veteran with over 15 years of experience. Read the full biography.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Boxing

Saudi Boxing: The Urgent Need to Reduce Prize Money for Sustainable Growth

Published

on

"Saudi Boxing: The Urgent Need to Reduce Prize Money for Sustainable Growth"

Spencer Brown sees a noticeable shift coming to Saudi boxing. Tyson Fury’s manager expects the massive purses to shrink, with fewer mega cards happening each year even though the Kingdom plans to stick around. From his perspective, the current spending pace simply cannot hold, creating a whole new reality for fighters across the sport.

“I think that the money has to go down because nobody can keep paying that sort of money,” Brown told The Ariel Helwani Show.

He made sure to dismiss rumors that Saudi investment is drying up completely. Instead, he sees Riyadh scaling back the volume of blockbuster events.

He pointed to Fury’s December 11 meeting with Anthony Joshua in Cardiff, a deal he helped put together, calling it one of the final spectacles of its kind. Moving forward, he predicts fans will see just one or two events of that size annually. While speaking as a dealmaker rather than an official spokesperson for Riyadh Season, his perspective carries genuine weight.

“I think this is one of the last of the big fights we’re going to see. I think you might get one or two big fights a year in future,” Brown said about the Fury vs. Anthony Joshua clash.

The real trouble will be convincing boxers to accept smaller checks again. Once a fighter pockets Saudi riches, traditional offers funded by gate receipts or pay-per-view sales feel like an insult. A matchup can make all the sense in the world on paper, yet stall out completely if someone insists on another monster payday.

That dynamic could trigger prolonged layoffs. Fighters risk sitting around, holding out hope for an invitation to the rare marquee card. Veterans near the end of their careers do not have time to waste on the sidelines, but the temptation of holding out for life-changing money remains strong.

A market cool-down could ultimately force promoters to build fights around realistic budgets again. For that model to succeed, fighters who want to stay active will have to adjust their financial expectations accordingly.

Fighters who grew accustomed to eight-figure guarantees for low-demand, mismatched events are going to hit a wall of stubborn inactivity before reality sets in.

Human nature and boxing economics suggest the immediate reaction won’t be humility. It will be entitlement.

When a boxer makes $10 million to $20 million fighting an unheralded opponent in an atmosphere with minimal gate pressure, that number ceases to be a windfall in their mind. It becomes their baseline. Returning to a traditional promotional model where their guarantee is tied directly to pay-per-view buys and ticket sales in London, New York, or Las Vegas feels like a drastic demotion.

The fallout is likely to split fighters into distinct groups:

First come the holdouts. The biggest names with heavy bank accounts will sit on the sidelines, convinced that their manager or promoter simply isn’t trying hard enough, or that Riyadh will eventually circle back when a headline slot opens.

They will post training clips on social media, call out other stars, demand absurd splits, and reject viable market-rate offers. Some will sit out twelve to eighteen months before grasping that the sovereign wealth subsidy has actually contracted. For aging stars, this wait will quietly run out their athletic primes.

Second comes the rude awakening for mid-tier names. Fighters who received inflated purses simply to fill out stacked undercards will discover that traditional promoters have zero appetite to subsidize them. If a fighter does not shift tickets in their home market or drive subscriptions, domestic promoters cannot afford them at Saudi rates.

These fighters will face a blunt ultimatum: accept pay cuts of 60 to 75 percent, or retire. Those who need money to maintain luxury spending habits will swallow their pride, sign realistic contracts, and return to competitive, grinding fights where they actually have to take risks.

Ultimately, the market correction will be painful. Boxing spent years living in an artificial economy where risk and commercial return were completely divorced. Once the spigot tightens, the fighters who want to stay relevant will have no choice but to get back in the gym and fight each other on realistic budgets, while the ones chasing long-gone purses will simply wait themselves into irrelevance.

Share this article

About the author

Boxing News 24 Desk

BoxingNews24.com has delivered independent boxing coverage since 2007, including original news, fight analysis, schedules, and results. Our experienced boxing writers cover major fighters and events worldwide, with published content reviewed by editors for accuracy.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Canelo Alvarez Reveals Top 5 Best Fighters in the World | Boxing News 2023

Published

on

Canelo Alvarez Reveals Top 5 Best Fighters in the World | Boxing News 2023

Having previously been considered as the pound-for-pound king, Canelo Alvarez is on a quest to prove that he remains amongst the elite, and the four-division world champion has revealed his top five active pound-for-pound fighters.

Many fight fans considered Canelo to be the pound-for-pound number one between 2019 and 2022, as he continued his long unbeaten streak since a 2013 loss to Floyd Mayweather and progressed through the weight divisions.

In November 2019, Alvarez dethroned WBO light-heavyweight world champion Sergey Kovalev to claim world honours in a fourth division, before moving back down to super-middleweight and capturing all four 168lb titles in an 11-month spell to become boxing’s first undisputed super-middleweight champion.

Canelo has since suffered defeats to both Dmitry Bivol and Terence Crawford and the 36-year-old now finds himself without a belt, but he is set for a world title challenge at the end of the month, when he heads to Saudi Arabia and attempts to dethrone Christian Mbilli.

Speaking to DAZN Boxingahead of that title bid, Canelo revealed his current top five boxers in the sport, noticeably opting not to include himself.

“My top five pound-for-pound fighters are [Oleksandr] Usyk, [Naoya] Inoue, Bivol, Shakur [Stevenson] and Gervonta [Davis].”

Canelo’s selections may come as no surprise, with Usyk and Inoue viewed as the top two fighters on most people’s pound-for-pound lists.

Bivol currently holds three of the four world titles at light heavyweight, making the next defence of those belts against Callum Smith in December, while Stevenson looks poised for a showdown with Devin Haney later this year.

As for Davis, he may be the surprise inclusion in Canelo’s list, with ‘Tank’ having not competed since March 2025 when he was held to a controversial draw with Lamont Roach.

Continue Reading

Boxing

Naoya Inoue vs Bam Rodriguez Mega Fight in Jeopardy: Im Not Waiting Sparks Concerns

Published

on

"Naoya Inoue vs ‘Bam’ Rodriguez Mega Fight in Jeopardy: 'I'm Not Waiting' Sparks Concerns"

As 2027 approaches, one of the most in-demand fights in the sport is an undisputed super-bantamweight title showdown between pound-for-pound king Naoya Inoue and three-weight world champion Jesse Rodriguez, but it now appears as though the proposed event is in serious jeopardy.

Inoue has taken some well-deserved time off following on from his career-best win over Junto Nakatani back in May, but ‘The Monster’ is keen to return to action in spring 2027, for an outing that many presumed would be against Rodriguez.

Meanwhile, ‘Bam’ has moved up to bantamweight and captured the WBA world title, but his trainer Robert Garcia made it clear that he wants another fight at 118lbs before moving up again and challenging for Inoue’s 122lb crown.

As of yet, there is no confirmed fight date for a mooted meeting between Rodriguez and fellow bantamweight titleholder Christian Medina (WBO), but the duo are expected to collide in either December or January, despite Inoue threatening to move on from Rodriguez if the American is not ready to fight him in March.

Still, just days ago, ‘The Monster’ revealed that he is indeed preparing for a meeting with the 26-year-old southpaw, as per Source of Boxing.

“Yes, I’m preparing with Jesse ‘Bam’ Rodriguez in mind.”

However, Inoue has now said on X that he is unwilling to sit around and wait for Rodriguez, instead stating that he has begun to prepare for a move into the featherweight division. This comment was perhaps motivated by Garcia recently suggesting April or May for the fight.

“I’m not going to sit around waiting for Bam, so I’m starting prep for featherweight too.”

In terms of which of the 126lb champions Inoue could face on his divisional debut, New York’s Bruce Carrington (WBC) would make the most sense for a stateside appearance, whilst Inoue has also previously mentioned IBF titleholder Angelo Leo as an option.

Another option could come this Saturday, as fellow Japanese featherweight title hopeful Tomoki Kameda challenges for Brandon Figueroa’s WBA crownso should he be successful, a tantalising all-Japanese featherweight world title affair may become Inoue’s most obvious route to the throne.

Since his latest comments, ‘Bam’s promoter Eddie Hearn has taken to social media to respond, saying they are still willing and ready to make the fight happen.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending