Boxing
Chris Algieri explains how Dmitry Bivol’s style is a risky challenge for Terenka Crawford
Published
1 year agoon
Chris Algieri argues against the idea of Terenka Crawford, who for the first time defending his undisputed Middle Age championships before Dmitryjum Bivol.
A retired world champion 140 pounds Algieri states that Bivol 6’0 ″ (24-1, 12 KO) would be too high for 5’9 ″ Crawford (42-0, 31 KO) and “Stylistically” He is a bad duel for him. Crawford has a three -inch advantage of 75 ″ over 72 ″ Bivol, so the size would not be the main problem for which it would be potentially filled.
A risky bivol style
Rather, it’s about Bivol, a combination of impact, movement, production and fearlessness. He would not hesitate to go through Crawford’s arrows to bomb him with the rug with thermobarian bombs, passing the destruction from the explosion.
It may not be nice to Terenca, but it would be stress -full, full of fight. It would probably be more entertaining than last Saturday’s competition between Crawford and Canelo, in which there was a lack of drama and was tedious for long sections.
Algeri indicates that, unlike the flat Canelo Alvarez, Bivol is an excellent applicant, he fights “on his fingers”. It would not be the same situation for Terenca as it was for him Canelo with flat feet to order.
Sports thing
Algeri adds that “Crawford will never fight that he couldn’t win “ which excludes his consent to fight Bivol. Yesterday Crawford rejected the fight with David Benavidez, saying he was too huge.
This confirms what Algeri says about Crawford, taking only fights he knows he can win. This does not say much about his risks. It also reaches Turki Alalshikh. He could force Buda to a risky fight to get a superfigure with great money against Canelo last Saturday evening, instead of giving him on a silver plate after his strictly disputed victory over Israil Madrimov in 2024.
It would be a sporty thing to do. If Crawford refused to fight Bivol or Benavidez, Turki could tell him that Alvarez’s fight was out of the table.
Somehow Crawford would change his mind and agree to fight one or both fights if he knew he had missed a mega-million day with a exhausted, flat Canelo.
“People tweet me” Bud Crawford vs. Bivol at the age of 168, “said the host Dan Canobbio on his own Inside the boxing channelDiscussing the hypothetical fight between Terenka Crawford and Dmitry Bivol.
Facing a different type of warrior
“No. No. A bad idea. No, because Bivol does not move like a huge guy. He is not sluggish at all. He is inside and outside. He points out. He is long. He is long. He is statuesque. He is huge. No,” said boxing expert Chris Algeri.
I do not agree with Algeri. Crawford is not a bad idea to fight Bivol. If Crawford was fine to fight the shell with the cars of Errola Spence in 2023, David Avanesian or the past of his main Shawn Porter, why would it not be a good idea to fight Bivol?
Is it because Crawford would not be once a favorite and would be against someone who could beat him? Shouldn’t sport apply to teams and fighters facing the opposition, in which they are not expected to win all the time? Why should it be different for Crawford, unless his career is smoke and mirrors from the very beginning?
“In this era I do not intend to say that weight classes do not matter, but we enter the strange slippery slopes in which we are just fighting,” said Canobbio.
“Bivol is heading for him, but also stylistically, the way he moves,” said Algeri, argue against Crawford fighting Bivol. “Canelo is completely flat. A smaller warrior may have a chance against him. Bivol is never flat. The guy literally lives on the toes. It’s really arduous [fight for Crawford]. “
Dan Ambrose was a leading voice in Boxing News 24 For years, known for his senseless sport. Love or hate him, Dan built forceful supporters thanks to his truthful analysis, direct opinions and a thorough report from the global boxing scene.
His articles often cause a debate among fans because he is not afraid to question popular narratives or performances of fighters. In addition to his opinion, Dan provides messages, preview and failure after the fight, which give readers both details and perspective.
Last updated on 16.09.2025
You may like
Boxing
Arturo Torres Collapses After Fatal TKO: Shocking Video Highlights Tragic Boxing Incident
Published
6 hours agoon
September 29, 2026
Horrific footage has emerged showing Arturo “Lobito” Torres collapsing in the ring moments after his final fight was stopped in Mexicali.
Torres died on September 25six days after suffering serious injuries following his fight at Parque Vicente Guerrero on September 19.
The 26-year-old’s corner had already stopped the contest when Torres remained on his feet for a matter of seconds.
Then his body gave way.
Footage shows Torres slumping limply to the canvas as those around him immediately rush to his aid.
He was subsequently hospitalized and underwent emergency surgery, but his injuries ultimately proved too severe.
Torres died six days after stepping into the ring for the final time.
Horrific 💔 pic.twitter.com/Nnqo5bsrLn
— World Boxing News (@WorldBoxingNews) September 29, 2026
Arturo Torres Funeral
Torres was laid to rest in Mexicali on September 28 as family, friends and members of the local community said goodbye to the young fighter.
Footage from Mexico showed a lengthy funeral procession making its way through the city nine days after his final fight.
Sadly, the sight of a boxer’s limp body slumping to the canvas is not unfamiliar in this sport.
Having covered boxing for 16 years, World Boxing News is all too familiar with the distressing sight of a fighter in trouble after a hard contest.
Sometimes the consequences mean the end of a career. On terrible occasions, they are far greater.
For Torres, what happened after his final fight ended with a young life being cut tragically short.
The footage is difficult enough to watch without knowing what happened next. Knowing that Torres never recovered makes those final moments in the ring considerably harder.
Nine days after the fight, the streets of Mexicali filled for his funeral procession.
Arturo “Lobito” Torres was only 26.
About the Author
Phil Jay is the Editor-in-Chief of World Boxing News (WBN), a BWAA-acknowledged boxing news website founded in 2010. A veteran boxing reporter with 16 years of experience, he has interviewed world champions, broken international exclusives, and reported ringside from major events. His work is published worldwide through WBN and distributed on platforms including Apple News.
Read Phil Jay’s full bio and latest stories.
Boxing
Mike Tyson vs. Larry Holmes: The Underrated Crown Jewel of Boxing History
Published
8 hours agoon
September 29, 2026
What happens when an unstoppable force at the peak of his destructive powers collides with one of the craftiest, most durable former champions in heavyweight history?
Today we take a closer look at a defining world heavyweight championship clash from January 1988: undisputed, unified powerhouse “Iron” Mike Tyson squaring off against living legend and former long-reigning heavyweight champion, “The Easton Assassin” Larry Holmes.

While general consensus often points to Tyson’s 91-second blowout of Michael Spinks as the eternal highlight of his prime, his battle with Holmes remains vastly overlooked. On paper, critics were quick to dismiss the 38-year-old former champion returning from a lengthy 21-month layoff. To many, an aging Holmes was simply being served up to a relentless young demolition man.
Yet, when the opening bell rang, the narrative shifted. Holmes did not enter the ring merely to collect a paycheck. Armed with an 81-inch wingspan, an all-time great jab, and deep veteran savvy, Holmes brought a cynical, tactical game plan designed to neutralize Tyson’s explosive combinations, tie him up, and drag the young phenom into deep, frustrating waters. It was wisdom and experience against a peak destructive force.
However, underestimating peak Mike Tyson’s discipline is a dangerous mistake. Guided by Kevin Rooney, Tyson was far more than an athletic slugger. He displayed calculated poise, cutting off the ring with terrifying patience while systematically solving an all-time great veteran puzzle.
Did Iron Mike deliver an emphatic statement that history has unfairly buried? Is this the single most underrated victory during the long and illustrious career of the Easton Assasin?
This edition of Rummy’s Corner breaks down the tactical clash, the subtle ring craft, and the enduring historical vindication behind this classic heavyweight showdown. This is Rummy’s Corner (written, narrated, and produced by Geoffrey Ciani).
About the author
Geoffrey Ciani
Geoffrey Ciani has covered boxing since 2000 and is the creator and host of the popular YouTube channel Rummy’s Cornerwhere he delivers in-depth analysis, storytelling, and breakdowns of classic and modern fights.
Boxing
50 Years Ago: Remembering Muhammad Ali vs. Ken Norton III – The Titanic Rubber Match at Yankee Stadium
Published
14 hours agoon
September 28, 2026
Throughout his incomparable ring career, the one and only Muhammad Ali always, always had nothing but trouble with one particular fighter and his “awkward” style. This was Ken Norton, whom Ali fought three times in the 1970s, with each fight going all the way to the judges’ scorecards.
Ali, it’s fair to say, never once comprehensively defeated Norton; the three fights were all desperately close affairs, with the final fight being viewed by many as highly controversial. It was 50 years ago today when Ali and Norton met for the final time.
The fight took place inside a sold-out Yankee Stadium in New York, with richer fans shelling out a then quite enormous $200 for a ringside seat. The fight proved memorable, the scoring in particular. For once again, Norton, with his great physical strength and stamina, his counter-punching ability and his unusual cross-armed defense, gave the great Ali fits. Back when the two legends met the first time, in March of 1973, a then-unknown Norton broke Ali’s jaw and won a 12-round split decision. Ali, when his jaw had mended, blamed poor training and a lack of respect for his foe for the loss. Ali trained perhaps as hard as he ever did ahead of the rematch. The sequel was another tough affair for both men, with Ali this time edging Norton via split decision. It would be three years before the two met in the rubber-match, with Ali’s world title on the line.
However, by September of 1976, Ali really should have been retired. The great man had shocked the world – again – by regaining the crown from an “invincible” George Foreman, but Joe Frazier had taken too much from Ali in their brutal Manila trilogy, and Ali’s legs, reflexes and internal organs had been suffering ever since. Norton – who had bounced back after being crushed by Foreman in a March 1974 world title challenge – had won seven fights in a row. Now set to face Ali with the title on the line for the first time, the former Marine was in absolutely tip-top shape.
Ali approached his third date with the trickiest, most unsolvable opponent of his career with a grim determination. Still, Ali was in full form vocally, with “Norton must fall” being the champion’s mantra. But was Ali trying to convince himself? In truth, Ali had to know there was very little chance of him knocking out Norton, a man he had never come close to putting on the canvas.
And so the fight raged on. Norton, again never once hurt by Ali, did what he had done in fights one and two. Norton seemed to have an innate ability when it came to timing Ali, his jab especially.
Ali really did try everything he could to unnerve Norton in the third fight. Ali danced, for as long as he could manage before fatigue intervened; he rope-a-doped, and Ali talked constantly, hurling insults at Norton. But at one point, having been doubled over by a nasty Norton body shot, Ali had to dig down into his inner reserves. It was all up for grabs going into the final round, but then Norton’s corner made a terrible decision. Norton’s corner instructed their warrior not to take any chances, that he was ahead and needed only to hear the final bell.
Ali used every ounce of strength and guile he had left, and he won the final round. This clinched Ali the fight. Ali, looking embarrassed in mid-ring, saw his challenger break into tears. All these years later, the fight and its decision are often debated, with most fans and historians feeling that, yes, Norton did win the fight. But Ali was the true King of the Ring, and his enormous reputation and ability to win over the scoring officials perhaps won him this fight more than anything else. One thing is certain: Joe Frazier aside, nobody ever tested Ali’s mettle as severely as Norton did.

About the author
James Slater
James Slater is a senior boxing journalist at Boxing247.com (formerly East Side Boxing) and has covered the sport for more than two decades. Known for his deep expertise, he reports on breaking news, conducts fighter interviews, and delivers authoritative perspective on boxing’s past and present.
Paul Felder: ‘I thought he had a heart attack’ at UFC Vegas 121
Raoni Barcelos says he’s ‘really fine’ following frightening UFC stoppage
Josh Hokit accuses Tom Aspinall of faking eye injury to leave UFC
Trending
-
Boxing2 days agoDana White Questions Ryan Garcias Ability to Lure Crawford Back into the Ring
-
Boxing2 days agoBen Whittaker Faces Crucial Test Against Wallace in Career-Defining Step Up
-
MMA2 days agoUFC gives update on Raoni Barcelos after scary stoppage
-
MMA1 day agoRenato Moicano hails Raoni Barcelos as ‘warrior’ after UFC Vegas 121
-
MMA1 day agoMagomed Zaynukov shuts down UFC Qatar fight rumors, out until 2027
-
MMA2 days agoDarren Till still thinks Mike Perry fight would sell out a stadium for BKFC: "I want that fight to start next year"
-
MMA2 days agoAaron Pico lost two top-ranked opponents before accepting Losene Keita fight: "It's been a crazy few months"
-
MMA2 days agoDana White confused over Max Kellerman's claim about role in promoting Fury vs. Joshua


