Chris Algieri argues against the idea of Terenka Crawford, who for the first time defending his undisputed Middle Age championships before Dmitryjum Bivol.
A retired world champion 140 pounds Algieri states that Bivol 6’0 ″ (24-1, 12 KO) would be too high for 5’9 ″ Crawford (42-0, 31 KO) and “Stylistically” He is a bad duel for him. Crawford has a three -inch advantage of 75 ″ over 72 ″ Bivol, so the size would not be the main problem for which it would be potentially filled.
A risky bivol style
Rather, it’s about Bivol, a combination of impact, movement, production and fearlessness. He would not hesitate to go through Crawford’s arrows to bomb him with the rug with thermobarian bombs, passing the destruction from the explosion.
It may not be nice to Terenca, but it would be stress -full, full of fight. It would probably be more entertaining than last Saturday’s competition between Crawford and Canelo, in which there was a lack of drama and was tedious for long sections.
Algeri indicates that, unlike the flat Canelo Alvarez, Bivol is an excellent applicant, he fights “on his fingers”. It would not be the same situation for Terenca as it was for him Canelo with flat feet to order.
Sports thing
Algeri adds that “Crawford will never fight that he couldn’t win “ which excludes his consent to fight Bivol. Yesterday Crawford rejected the fight with David Benavidez, saying he was too huge.
This confirms what Algeri says about Crawford, taking only fights he knows he can win. This does not say much about his risks. It also reaches Turki Alalshikh. He could force Buda to a risky fight to get a superfigure with great money against Canelo last Saturday evening, instead of giving him on a silver plate after his strictly disputed victory over Israil Madrimov in 2024.
It would be a sporty thing to do. If Crawford refused to fight Bivol or Benavidez, Turki could tell him that Alvarez’s fight was out of the table.
Somehow Crawford would change his mind and agree to fight one or both fights if he knew he had missed a mega-million day with a exhausted, flat Canelo.
“People tweet me” Bud Crawford vs. Bivol at the age of 168, “said the host Dan Canobbio on his own Inside the boxing channelDiscussing the hypothetical fight between Terenka Crawford and Dmitry Bivol.
Facing a different type of warrior
“No. No. A bad idea. No, because Bivol does not move like a huge guy. He is not sluggish at all. He is inside and outside. He points out. He is long. He is long. He is statuesque. He is huge. No,” said boxing expert Chris Algeri.
I do not agree with Algeri. Crawford is not a bad idea to fight Bivol. If Crawford was fine to fight the shell with the cars of Errola Spence in 2023, David Avanesian or the past of his main Shawn Porter, why would it not be a good idea to fight Bivol?
Is it because Crawford would not be once a favorite and would be against someone who could beat him? Shouldn’t sport apply to teams and fighters facing the opposition, in which they are not expected to win all the time? Why should it be different for Crawford, unless his career is smoke and mirrors from the very beginning?
“In this era I do not intend to say that weight classes do not matter, but we enter the strange slippery slopes in which we are just fighting,” said Canobbio.
“Bivol is heading for him, but also stylistically, the way he moves,” said Algeri, argue against Crawford fighting Bivol. “Canelo is completely flat. A smaller warrior may have a chance against him. Bivol is never flat. The guy literally lives on the toes. It’s really arduous [fight for Crawford]. “
Dan Ambrose was a leading voice in Boxing News 24 For years, known for his senseless sport. Love or hate him, Dan built forceful supporters thanks to his truthful analysis, direct opinions and a thorough report from the global boxing scene.
His articles often cause a debate among fans because he is not afraid to question popular narratives or performances of fighters. In addition to his opinion, Dan provides messages, preview and failure after the fight, which give readers both details and perspective.