Connect with us

Opinions & Features

Wayne Elcock Helps a Modern Generation Change Their Lives

Published

on

WAYNE ELCOCK didn’t realize how much his father admired him as a boxer until it was too slow.

Different people have different ideas about how to motivate others, and Elcock’s father apparently thought it best to reserve praise.

“I got all the way to the final of the tournament,” Elcock says of his amateur days, “and the first thing my dad said was, ‘Well, son, nobody remembers second place.’”

“Even if I knocked someone out, he would still talk about the first punch he landed on me.

“I think it was just his way, he didn’t want me to get cocky. But I stopped loving boxing and stopped doing it for four or five years.

“I worked, paving roads. It was good money, but it was 10 hours of difficult work every day and I didn’t feel like going to the gym, so I went to the pub. I would watch the Saturday night fights and I would see the boxers on TV that I had beaten as amateurs and then I would get into fights in the pub. I couldn’t stand alcohol and looking back I must have been frustrated.

“Boxing was out of the question. I was overweight, I wasn’t doing anything with my life, I was going out for drinks and fucking. I was hanging out with mates who had no ambition and didn’t want anyone else to have ambition. If I talked about boxing again, they’d laugh at me.”

But one person who never laughed at Elcock’s boxing was his father. He may not have been effusive in his praise—at least not to Elcock himself—but that was perhaps a sign of how seriously he took it. “He begged me to come back to boxing,” Elcock says of those lost years.

And he eventually did – but it was too slow for his father, who died in a car crash in 1998. For Elcock, it was obviously a devastating event, but his father’s death led to his rebirth as a boxer – when he learned, posthumously, what his father really thought of him.

“Every man and his dog was at my dad’s funeral. People came up to me and asked me about my boxing. Everyone said that he told anyone who would listen how brilliant I was, how far I would go, that I would be world champion.

“I was sitting there after the funeral and I thought, ‘I have to finish this for Dad.’”

The 10-year professional career that followed, beginning in 1999, may not have quite lived up to his dad’s expectations of a world title, but it was nonetheless a proud, electrifying and decorated campaign, encompassing reigns in Britain, England and the WBU. And there was a chance for world glory, with an unsuccessful challenge to IBF middleweight champion Arthur Abraham. By then, though, ‘Mad Dog’ had one foot out of the competition door, seeing his previous fight – a surprise victory over Howard Eastman, one of the best British middleweights of the 21st century – as his lowest point and a vindication of his dad’s faith in him.

“Every time I had a professional fight, I would put a picture of my dad in my sock,” he says. “After I beat Eastman, I took it out, looked up and said, ‘Dad, I did it.’”

That unanimous decision in September 2007 is Elcock’s best, though he also boasts victories over Darren Rhodes (twice), Anthony Farnell, Lawrence Murphy (avenging a first-round knockout defeat), Steve Bendall and Darren McDermott. Eastman’s victory led to a world title fight with Abraham, but Elcock says he was motivated at the time by something less conducive to fighting spirit than honoring his deceased parent.

“I was just thinking about the money,” he says. “It would have been nice to leave after Eastman, but Abraham was a good payday. It was only eight or nine weeks after Eastman, and I got up every morning thinking, ‘Fuck!’ But I said, ‘Just think about the money; just get in there and see how it goes.'”

Elcock was knocked down in the second round but otherwise showed quicker hands and more punching power than Abraham, but it was the German’s superior power that proved decisive in the fifth round when he was knocked out in Basel, Switzerland.

“I wasn’t confident, but after the fourth round, Abraham got cut, I was doubling and tripling my jabs. My attitude changed. I started to believe I could win – and then I got stopped!

“He was definitely the hardest boxer I’ve ever faced. When he knocked me down in the second round, he hit me so difficult it didn’t even hurt, does that make sense? I didn’t even know I was knocked down, the referee was just counting and I was like, ‘What are you doing?’

Elcock fought twice more, most recently in the “Battle of Brum” derby with Matthew Mackin in March 2019. Mackin won in three rounds, although Elcock claims he was handicapped: “I broke my leg in two places,” he says. “My shin and fibula – the first from playing football and the second because I was training for it.”

Injured, coming off a massive defeat and at the age of 35, Elcock decided the logical thing to do was retire – but like many others, he at least felt the temptation to fight again.

“The fight with Darren Barker happened, but a few weeks later I got infirmed. My weight dropped to 11 pounds and I had to pull out.

“Then, after a few years out of the ring, I was offered James DeGale. I thought, ‘Okay, I’ll put money into my business,’ and I asked how much, and they said seven grand. Seven grand to fight an Olympic gold medalist!

“Luckily I didn’t need it, but for a lot of former players, seven thousand dollars would be a lot of money. [Some] promoters see someone with a name and instead of helping him, they cheat him.”

MANCHESTER – APRIL 5: Wayne Elcock of England and his manager Frank Maloney celebrate after the WBU Middleweight Championship fight between Wayne Elcock of England and Anthony Farnell of England on April 5, 2003 at the MEN Arena in Manchester, England. Wayne Elcock of England won the fight. (Photo by John Gichigi/Getty Images)

Elcock then focused on his novel callings. He started out as a trainer, then supplemented that with a boxing shop, where he meets Boxing News. Mad Dog’s Boxing Store, on the outskirts of Birmingham, has defied the decline of brick-and-mortar retail by running the store himself, offering a more personalised experience than shopping online or in a chain store.

Our interview is interrupted several times as customers drop in. Each is an amateur boxer stocking up for the novel season, and each is dealt with by Elcock, who discusses their requirements, experience level, weight etc. and makes personalised recommendations – not just the ones that cost the most.

“If a beginner came in and wanted a pair of Reyes gloves for £200-£300, I wouldn’t sell them to them,” he says. “I won’t sell you what you want, I’ll sell you what you want. need. Most of the shops are run by businessmen or enthusiasts. I don’t know of any other shop where a former professional could advise you in this way. I’ve even had kids on the pads there.

When it came to coaching, Elcock started with a program called Box Clever, an ingenious “mobile gym” that consisted of a hoop that could be packed into the back of a van along with other equipment, then unloaded and stored anywhere there was space – usually schools.

Elcock explains why he wanted to teach children boxing: ‘Where I grew up, there was a lot of crime [Chelmsley Wood]. You went one way or the other. Most went one way [towards crime]; I was the rarity that went the other way. My buddies would say, “Come on, our car got stolen over there.” I’d say, “I’m going to the gym.” They’d say, “You jerk!” But I knew the respect you get as a boxer far outweighed the respect you get as a criminal.

“I wrote a programme for children. It combined boxing with education. For example, maths – we would score a fight. We set up tasks with bronze, silver and gold prizes; courses divided into rounds. They didn’t even know they were educating themselves! Box Clever grew very quickly. We travelled all over the Midlands; 39 schools.

“The council came to me and said, ‘We’ve got a kid here – an absolute nightmare, excluded from school, constantly in trouble with the police. If you can do something about him, it would be a miracle. He turned up, 11, with his mum. He just looked at me and said, ‘I don’t care who you are. I’m only here because she dragged me here.’ He just sat there. Everything I asked him to do, he just said ‘no.’ I managed to get the gloves on him. He hit the shin guards and I said, ‘Wow, you’ve got some power there! It’d be a shame if you got in trouble again; you’ve got a gift.’

“The next week he came back. A few weeks later his mum said, ‘What have you done with him? He eats oatmeal in the morning, he goes for a run. I even took him back to school.’ He was 11 then. Now he’s 26 and a professional.”

That pro, Birmingham welterweight Elliot Hurley, boxs out of Elcock’s rival gym, Kronk Birmingham, officially sponsored by the Detroit legend. Box Clever still caters to kids, the disabled and beginners, while those looking to compete train at Kronk. Elcock’s son, Wayne Jr., is among them.

“I didn’t want him to box, but the kids at school knew his dad was a boxer, so he came to me and said he wanted to try.” Junior is now a 16-year-old amateur welterweight with 12 fights to his name, including a Midlands title.

Overall, Elcock, now 50, is feeling good, which he admits is down to the advice his trainer Paddy Lynch gave him when he was still fighting.

“Paddy got me thinking about what I was going to do when I retired,” he says. “I would have said, ‘Retire, you c***? I’m just getting started!’ But he said, ‘Just put some more pounds in the bank, start jotting down ideas in the back of your mind. It seems a long way off, but it’s passing quickly.’

“People think you make a lot of money boxing. They say to me, ‘What are you doing working? You should be on the beach drinking cocktails.’ I had money in the bank, but I’m a grind and I wanted to pay back Paddy for what he did for me.

“I’m making more money now than I ever did when I was boxing. The gym is paid for; the pros can train for free. I’ll only take the bare minimum if they win the British title.

“My satisfaction does not lie in money, but in changing the lives of others.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions & Features

Boxing in a diminutive gym has become too predictable

Published

on

I have NO extra sensory perception and cannot predict lottery numbers. But when one of our reporters omitted the six-round and four-round scores at a small-venue show last week (and couldn’t be reached by deadline), I added the scores of 60-54 and 40-36 to the report without a shudder doubts. After the magazine went to press, the same results arrived in my inbox and therein lies a earnest problem for British boxing.

It seems that so many diminutive shows in diminutive venues, especially north of Watford, host matchmaking so risky, so insipid, so cynical, that even the choreographed WWE seems like an legitimate sport by comparison.

Every week during the peak of the boxing season I look at the weekly national reports and the same numbers come up over and over again – 40-36, 60-54, . Maybe these are the lotto numbers we’re looking for?

About 30 apprentices regularly appear on this hamster wheel of reports, coddling, cuddling and mauling, hoping to avoid cuts or shutdowns, only to earn another paycheck soon thereafter. Their extensive records include narrow (sometimes one or two) stoppage victories; they actually pose no threat to your home (only to yourself and your long-term health).

For the first few fights, this may be considered acceptable as the newborn novice has to deal with the physical demands of the professional game. However, there is something disconcerting about a competitor who is almost 10-0 on the track in a diminutive gym and preys on competitors who are losing records. This is a record-breaking achievement that we don’t see to this extent in other countries, and when these players first step up to the challenge, they will likely fail without the foundation of a more competitive base.

LONDON – MARCH 8: An Oxford boxer greets the crowd during the 100th Varsity Boxing match between the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge at York Hall in Bethnal Green on March 8, 2007 in London, England. The best of the Blues’ nine fights from featherweight to heavyweight was ultimately won by Oxford. (Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

Better fights cost more, yes, but that’s why quality and production values ​​are the basis of any form of entertainment.

One argument for this 40-36 epidemic would be that ticket seller fans are just joyful to see their guy win and get into a minor title fight. However, I’m sure the rest of those present would prefer to see a competitive fight. If you enjoy watching two men in shorts cuddling for 12-18 minutes, you can do it from the comfort of your own home via Google.

Many people love the thrill of fighting at any level. Even when a fight breaks out in a parking lot or playground, people have a natural tendency to gather around to witness the fierce battle of wills and physicality. But it’s unlikely you’ll hear a passerby shout, “My partner is so good at all this cuddling.” Or “I saw this guy hugging in Aldi last week, he’s an awkward customer.”

What other sporting event would you attend where the score is guaranteed to be almost 100? There is a sense of historical inertia here, where a culture of “it’s always been done this way” has led to an uninspiring and bleak outlook. This has gotten to the point where many matchmakers and promoters feel it is acceptable to put on, let’s be candid, crap fights. As a boxing fan, I have no interest in watching these shows and sometimes I think that our little stalwart supporter Andy Whittle deserves a purple heart for some of the trash he has witnessed in the backwaters of boxing. It is rumored that he had the number 40-36 tattooed on his back to commemorate his pain.

The British boxing ecosystem would be better off if one 1-0 fighter met another 1-0 fighter. Up-and-coming boxers will learn more, and fans in attendance will have fun and be interested in future performances. It is the sport of brave men and women, and to a lesser extent matchmakers.

This sense of the unexpected is what makes sports so electrifying. Even a minnow in an FA Cup match has a slim chance of upsetting a Premier League giant with home-field advantage. In small-hall boxing, few opportunities are taken, and that leads to more major promoters – apart from the more capable blue-chip fighters who usually have the firepower to end a six-round fight before the inevitable 60-54 score.

has traditionally been a documentary and that’s why we’re including these small-room, in-ring reports, with scales and additional information you may not find on Boxrec. But a lot Boxing news readers tell me they just scroll through these pages because it’s basically the same result and the names change every week.

Skip to the amateur side of this publication, however, and you’ll regularly read about competitive, well-matched fights at all levels, from club appearances to major tournaments. This pure sporting element is unfortunately lost in an increasingly cynical and short-sighted, small-hall, unimaginative track. Rinse and repeat.

In the aged days, fights in diminutive venues were more competitive. Even in the era of Nobby Nobbs’ Losers Restricted stable, where the capable Peter Buckley accidentally hurt a potential client and held up a wheezing newbie to keep next week’s paycheck. – Are you okay, buddy? Peter whispered in the clinch, then winked at the ring.

This handsome British tradition of “Nobbins” – during which an enthusiastic and engaged crowd threw money into the ring after a classic in a diminutive hall – is unfortunately long gone. Today they would keep the rest in their pocket.

I would love to see the return of Nobbins culture, although there would need to be a contactless payment option at the ring posts. Better fights would also be nice.

Continue Reading

Opinions & Features

A community boxing legend honored on a special night

Published

on

RECENTLY, over 100 former members of the South Norwood & Victory Amateur Boxing Club gathered in Croydon for a special reunion to honor the club’s founder and long-time coach, Terry Smith.

Now 85 years senior, Terry has devoted nearly six decades of his life to mentoring youthful boxers and helping them develop both in the ring and as individuals. The meeting was a heartfelt event, with participants coming from all over the UK and messages of support pouring in from all over the world, with everyone expressing their gratitude for the impact Terry had on their lives.

Terry founded South Norwood & Victory ABC in 1979 with the vision of not only training boxers, but also providing a safe and sound space where youthful boys and men could develop crucial life values ​​such as discipline, respect and perseverance. Over the years, he has become a mentor and role model for countless people, shaping their futures that reach far beyond the sport of boxing.

Through South Norwood & Victory, Terry and his co-coaches have produced numerous champions in both amateur divisions, many of whom have gone on to achieve great success at the professional level.

Among the participants of the reunion was Joshua Buatsi, the 2016 Olympic bronze medalist and one of the club’s most famed graduates. Buatsi, who began boxing under Terry’s tutelage as a teenager, spoke highly of his former trainer. “Terry didn’t just teach us how to box; he taught us how to be better people. The values ​​he instilled in me – discipline, resilience, respect – are things I carry with me every day, both in and out of the ring. I owe him so much.”

Mark Gillespie, co-coach of the South Norwood & Victory Amateur Boxing Club and former multiple-time junior national champion who organized the reunion, paid tribute to Terry’s influence both in and out of the ring. He reflected: “Like many other members of the club, Terry was like a second father to me. In addition to his incredible commitment and knowledge as a boxing coach – helping us develop our technical skills and passion for the sport – Terry invested in us as people. He taught us life lessons that went far beyond boxing, instilling in us a sense of personal pride and self-worth.

Mark added that Terry’s influence extended to teaching valuable social and life skills that shaped the futures of many youthful boxers. “He taught us how to maintain discipline and respect, how to deal with failure and how to support each other both as athletes and as people. These were lessons in resilience, responsibility and leadership that stayed with us for life and positively impacted both our family and professional lives.”

This quote further illustrates Terry’s holistic approach to coaching, emphasizing that his legacy is not just about the sport itself, but how he helped shape confident and capable youthful men ready to face life’s challenges.

Other members shared similar sentiments, emphasizing how Terry’s influence helped them overcome personal challenges and grow as individuals. One long-time member recalls: “When I first joined the club as a kid, I was on the wrong path. Terry believed in me when no one else did and gave me a sense of direction. It’s something I will never forget.”

The reunion not only honored Terry’s sacrifice, but also highlighted the lasting impact South Norwood & Victory ABC has had on the local community. Former boxers, many of whom are now successful in their personal and professional lives, spoke about the club’s influence in shaping who they are today. Messages from former members who were unable to attend in person came from as far away as Spain and Thailand, highlighting the breadth of Terry’s legacy.

Reflecting on the evening, Terry, with his characteristic humility, expressed his gratitude for the outpouring of love and support. “I never expected something like this. I just always wanted to support these guys find their way, both in boxing and in life. Seeing them grow up and do well – that’s the best reward I could ask for.”

As Terry turns 86, his commitment to club members and their families remains as forceful as ever. South Norwood & Victory ABC is not just a boxing club – it is a community, a family and a testament to one man’s unwavering dedication to the betterment of others.

The meeting was a powerful reminder of Terry Smith’s enduring legacy, both in the sport of boxing and in the countless incarnations he has encountered.

Continue Reading

Opinions & Features

Beterbiev vs Bivol scoring: Ringside vs TV

Published

on

In fact, the superfight between Beterbiev and Bivol was so close that either one fighter could have won by a slim margin or it could have ended in a draw. It was a great fight at the highest level. After an intense 12 rounds of high-level fighting, the feeling in the ring was that Bivol had done enough to secure a hard-fought victory.

Personally, seeing it up close and personal was something different than re-watching the broadcast the next day. From the ring, it was easier to see how economical Bivol’s moves were, and you really got a greater sense of Beterbiev’s constant pressure – although I felt it was more noticeable in person that he was having difficulty pinning down Bivol.

I didn’t score in the live fight, but as I say, I had a feeling Bivol did. However, after watching it again on TV and scoring round by round, I found that after the final bell the balance was 115-113 in favor of Artur Beterbiev.

Truth be told, there are about four rounds that could have gone either way, depending on what you like. For example, round seven, the most intriguing of the fight, along with round 12. Bivol controlled the first two minutes beautifully, landing immaculate shots and avoiding Beterbiev’s action with impeccable technique, but the shots never did any damage and although his work clearly did enough to win the first two minutes,

Beterbiev hurt him in return and fired much more damaging shots in the final minute of the round. Depending on whether you prefer polished boxing under pressure or brutal work that clearly influences the outcome of this round.

RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA – OCTOBER 12: Dmitrii Bivol and Artur Beterbiev exchange blows during the IBF, IBO, WBC and WBO world title fight between Artur Beterbiev and Dmitrii Bivol as part of the Riyad Season – Card IV Crown Showdown at Kingdom Arena on October 12 2024 in Riyad. (Photo: Richard Pelham/Getty Images)

I’ve seen people suggest that Bivol ran too much. Nonsense! He boxed beautifully, his jab was on target and his movements were amazing, never wasted and always done with purpose. It’s basic to forget that Beterbiev knocks everyone out. Not with one punch, but with accumulating pressure, feints and never giving up.

Being forced to box perfectly against a hazardous, unrelenting boxer is exhausting, which is why no one has ever been able to go the full 12 points with Beterbiev. Bivol had to stay on the move, even though he had very little chance of escaping, he did it as best as anyone in his position could have done.

You can’t be greedy with Beterbiev. You jab, you string together pop combos, you earn his respect, and you move. There’s no point in tying him up all the time, because he’ll outrun you, and that’s his strength. Getting involved in a physical struggle with a man like that who can physically break you down will wear you out. There was nothing more Bivol could do. When he actually threw more in his combos, he was always hurt – his shots never really did damage.

While Arthur was firing intensely, Bivol actually pounced. He potentially could have responded more while being attacked, as it was in these moments that Beterbiev began to take control, but risked being eliminated. He took endless attacks from the man who knocks everyone out.

Similarly, with Beterbiev, people say he hit his gloves, which is true, but he hit them so firm that he damaged Bivol. In a post-fight interview, Bivol said that the bruise on his face was caused by Artur hitting his high guard.

They continued to deal damage that shocked Bivol, and with shots to the defender’s back and sickening body blows, his work was very effective. Artur started many rounds slowly and finished powerful.

He could have pressed the action earlier in the rounds to achieve a more spectacular victory, but once again Bivol is the most hard fighter to define in boxing and believe me, it was not basic for Artur.

In the end, both men countered perfectly and both gave their all, which ensured an intense chess match at the highest level, just as we expected.

It is also worth noting – although it is hard to imagine – that these two men are not perfectly functioning boxing robots, but people who, in addition to their excellent results and an attitude that never seems to show weakness, ultimately have to cope and fight experience adversity that they must find a way to overcome.

Riyad, Saudi Arabia: Dmitry Bivol in his locker room after a split decision. Lost to Artur Beterbiev.
October 13, 2024 Photo: Mark Robinson Matchroom Boxing.

Both are experienced, disciplined and well-trained enough to stay in shape and never leave it, but undeniably in a fight of this magnitude where there was no time for rest, fatigue played a key role in their victory. boxing absolutely perfect.

Perhaps that’s why Beterbiev didn’t press relentlessly from the first minute of each round, as he did later in the fight, thinking about going the distance, which is uncharted territory. On the other hand, Bivol showed a lot of energy at the beginning of the match and that may be why he was unable to respond to all of Beterbiev’s attacks towards the end of the match due to exhaustion.

Either way, what a brilliant fight. One that every boxing fan desperately wanted to see. I was lucky enough to witness it in person and it ended up being the best fight that could ever be had in boxing. Either of them could have won, and hopefully both will have a chance to gain the upper hand in the head-to-head rematch.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending